Cheap HDMI vs Expensive HDMI cable (Cheap on left Expensive on right)

!!! It's the same TV !!! record in deference time and put to gather by video editor.




Right Screen is IXOS + LCD TV Thailand, price less than 5000 Baht
Left Screen is Belkin + No Name, price less than 1000 Baht

Testing System:
Marantz SR7002
Sony BPD-S360
Sony Bravia W Series 40" LCD
Wharfedale Evo2 Series

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Cheap
• HDMI
• vs
• Expensive
• computer
• Cable

[hakemon]

Reason this is fake: HDMI cables, cheap or not, will not affect color quality or brightness, like would be possible in the analog domain. This is digital, it's either there or it's not. If anything, digital interference would just be breaking up of the picture with random pixel snow.

This is flat out fake.

[thumbwar73]

idk man, I bought a give dollar HDMI off amazon and honestly, it looked worse than my component cables, I guess if your going to buy an HDMI never go below $7.

[BrizzyMo]

@JWestTexas The cables have nothing to do with it. His picture settings were adjusted. However, if you think that the picture which supposedly represents the cheap cable connection looks superior, please do us all a favor and proceed to kill yourself asap. There's a reason Samsung screens are so popular. Better contrast and higher color saturation levels than most make for a better viewing experience. Anyone who disagrees partakes of the gay action. Thank you for your time.

[uaboob]

What? You mean all those standards for hdmi have been evolving for no reason? Those most retarded response I hear is that cables do not matter. Try and remember the audio is also traveling in that cable. My suggestion to those people that do not understand the science of a cable is to zip the pie hole. Yeah it sure makes a huge difference the longer the run so why is it degrading with distance? At 3/4 the length on a 35 ft length is it the same as a 3 ft cable? Both images are horrid btw.

[averyaccordion]

If you see the video fine, you are seeing the best image you can, chepa or not.

[averyaccordion]

Also, Static is ONLY for analog TV. if its one bit misses its target that frame, the frame turns black, or black with a few white spots for that frame. The worst that will happen with a bad cable is it cant arry the signal and all frames are BLACK! If ti works, you ARE seeing the FULL RESOLUTION SAME IMAGE as you would with an expensive. It is true, an expensive cable can carry more power, and can be LONGER without breaking the signal, because expensive ones cunduct better...

[averyaccordion]

He just changed the TV settings to screw with us. If you buy a cheap flash drive, and put a file on it, and get an expensive flash drive and put a file on it, if you take them off, the audio quality of the MP3 file will be EXACTLY the same. It wont lose quality. If something went wrong with the cheap flash drive, the audio quality doesnt get worse, the audio file breaks and gets corrupted.

HDMI cables do NOT get worse with quality. If one bit is off, the frame is off...

[Zer0K3wLL]

Cheap one is better obviously its cheaper :D

[The86rick]

Do not believe this!! A digital signal is the same no matter what cable you use. Only in very very long runs does a better quality cable help the error rate.

[strikerm70]

It doesnt matter if the cable is cheap or not. Why waste $100 for a HDMI cable?

[Noer477]

FAKEEEEEE

[JWestTexas]

The cheap HDMI looks better. Too much color saturation on the right screen. Black levels on right are too contrasted. It's not about how bright and vivid your display can be.