Ken Disagrees With Tracie's Model - The Atheist Experience
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (432)
-
stereo would be nice...
-
Kind of reminds me though of how much I'd like to strangle William Lane Craig whenever I listen to that guy for more then a minute. Such a condescending smug little shit.
And he won't debate non-philosophers, because he know he'd get his self-congratulating ass kicked up and down the street and back if he debated to many people. Which happened to him whenever he DID debate a rationalist.
Although me, I'd rather literally kick his ass, because otherwise I'd have to hear him talk.
-
I mean, if someone asked about -3 or something like that.You could go into how math applies to reality. But if someone tells me to define two, I'd grab two items and go 'one, two'.
If you have an item and you have another item, then together we call the amount of items two. If you have twice as many items we call THAT amount four.
Sheesh... I think Willaim Lane Craig, that smug asshole started with the math 'argument'. And this caller has an even MORE halfwitted version.
-
Why can't theists get that a thought is not an abstract nothing? It's an electro-chemical reaction in your brain. Without said reaction your thought would not exist and you would not have that thought.
In fact writing this very post required brain chemistry. Which is an actual physical property of the universe that can be measured.
It's the same with a lot of concepts, and if this guy was going to use numbers, he could have at least tried to talk about negative numbers or things like that.
-
@punnet2 This is a nonsensical statement. One is quantified by its singularity and has no component of size to be its reference. Therefore, two is merely a word attached to the concept of having 2 ones. For instance 1 hair is still one and one elephant is still one regardless of its size. These are simply words that represent concepts of wholeness which requires no need for an intelligent designer.
-
Very deep. Or not.
-
If 2 was off by even a millionth of millionth of a decimal place, then 2 + 2 would not = 4.
Obviously, an intelligent designer was required to make 2 + 2 = 4.
"Have you ever seen a mind without a brain?"
I think you're talking to one, Tracie.
MrRazorz 1 month ago 7
is this guy stoned?
keaco73 5 months ago 2