Body Of Pharoah Found In Red Sea
Top Comments
All Comments (539)
-
@travisanderson77 It's another falsification by Jews to obfuscate their true history which is they were the Hyksos barbarian invaders, a Semite blooded group of Aramaic speaking Nomads that invaded Egypt around 1800BC and took over everything. They were not SLAVES! These Hyksos still inhabited the Nile Delta region on the East side after being kicked out by the Egyptians who were NOT Semites. Avaris and Tanis were Hyksos cities. King Solomon and David ruled from the Nile Delta.
-
I do believe in the Red Sea Crossing, but this video's got the WRONG title.
-
Pharoah was very ugly
-
@travisanderson77 Roman? You mean Macedonian? It has been said she spoke up to 7 languages, amongst them ancient Egyptian..
-
@TheNWOtruth Cleopatra-a Roman by blood who had no desire, time or valid reason to learn to read the highly complex Hieroglyphics that were full understood only in the domain of Scholars, did not read Egyptian Hieroglyphics. It is also highly unlikely that she could speak the language with any fluency. She had, as did all Roman rulers of Egypt, scribes who would translate all relevant texts into Latin, and translators that would have been among her courtiers.
-
@TheNWOtruth I'm not an insufferable know it all just because you are wrong and I am right. You probably know a lot of things I don't, and vice versa, but on this topic-you are fighting an uphill battle with me. I have studied their history since I was a child, for over 20 years now in fact. There are a lot of things I don't know, but on this topic, I know quite a bit more than you-and that is the result of years of research and study.
-
@MightyZarkon To further prove you don't know what you're talking about, Tanis wasn't even founded when the Hyksos ruled Egypt. Avaris, true-was their capital during the 15th dynasty, but Tanis was founded in the late 20th dynasty-long after the Hyksos were driven out. In regards to the DNA tests, not only do pretty much all experts reject what you say, but you claim that Jews and Hyksos were the same. You can't even keep the terms right-Jews are not necessarily Hebrews.
-
@MightyZarkon First of all, way to lower the standards of the debate by being the first to call me a name, second-Manetho did indeed make the argument, but Jospehus simply copied it, and while Manetho is a good source of the reigns of the Pharaohs, Egyptologists do not accept all of what he said at face value, and the statement of the Hyksos being Hebrews was more political than archeological-again, something you would know if you knew what you were talking about.
-
@MightyZarkon And....you just lost the debate. You see, "Lower Egypt" is not a geographic designation (otherwise I would have said "Southern"). "Lower Egypt" was a political entity referring in fact to the NORTHERN part of the country-which the Hyksos ruled, namely the Delta. If you didn't know that the Egyptians called the Northern part of their country "Lower" because of the river flow, then you certainly don't know much do you? That's Ancient Egypt 101.
-
couldnt he get a more relaxed position ?
This Mummy is a commoner, nicknamed "Ginger", who was buried with is possessions sometime in the I or II dynasty-which predates the Exodus by around 1,500 years, which is believed to have taken place either in the XVIII or XIX dynasties, but before the reign of Merenptah, where we find the first mention in history of the lands inhabited by the Hebrews. All Pharoahs in the XIX and preceding XVIII are accounted for-none died by drowning.
travisanderson77 3 months ago 13
So how many things are wrong with the title of this video.
1.) There is nothing to suggest that this dude was a pharaoh.
2.) There is nothing to suggest he was drowned.
3.) The body was not "found" in the Red Sea.
bustermk2 2 months ago 12