Attorney David Allen examines a case going to the US Supreme Court. The court will decide a case with a basic fact pattern shared with other cases. The question the courts previously decided was whether use of a GPS tracking device by police violated the fourth amendment. Some courts decided use of a GPS tracking device did . Other courts decided it did not. They reasoned that tracking a car was similar to simply watching where a car went . Since these very similar cases produced different decisions by different courts the US Supreme Court will now decide which logic to follow. David Allen explains the rationale underlying the different decisions.
David Allen & Associates helping injured and disabled people throughout the west for 30 years.
We offer successful representation in Personal Injury, Social Security Disability and Insurance Disability claims.
Visit our offices for a free initial consultation.
In California:
5230 Folsom Blvd.
Sacramento, CA 95819
www.DavidAllenLawSacramento.com
(916) 455-4800
7400 Shoreline Drive, Ste. 1
Stockton, CA 95219
www.DavidAllenLawStockton.com
(916) 473-4800
1300 Clay Street, Ste. 600
Oakland, CA 94612
www.DavidAllenLawOakland.com
(510) 663-4600
In Nevada:
200 S. Virginia St.
Wells Fargo Building
Reno, NV 89501
www.DavidAllenLawReno.com
(775) 786-1020
3690 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
www.DavidAllenLawLasVegas.com
(702) 433-8700
Call us Toll Free (877) 876-4800
www.DavidAllenLaw.com
www.legalvideoblog.com
Thank you for posting this, davidallenlaw.
writersblock26 3 months ago