Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Lies and Distortions

This short video exposes two of the most egregious misrepresentations of fact from Richard Gage and his group, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

It's time to expose this bullshit for what it is.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• richard gage
• david chandler
• inside job
• 9/11
• controlled demolition
• alienentity1
• alienentity

[medicalbhyuuhhh]

You presented no scientific evidence. Just took statments out of context.

[AlienEntity1]

@medicalbhyuuhhh Uhmm, that's exactly what AE911Truth and Richard Gage are doing.

No science, just shrill and inflammatory talking points.

WTF does freefall have to do with Controlled Demolition anyways? Apparently (I guess Gage didn't check the facts) real CD's don't fall at freefall.

Is it scientific to make the claims Gage does? Not at all, but he does it anyways. And perhaps you believe him anyway......that's my whole point.

[ResuEmanA]

Another thing is how come the damage to the pentagon is minimal compared to that of the damage done to the towers, they wont even show the video mind you. And it is quite obvious that these were demolitions of some sort whether those "DAMN RAG HEADS" did it, or in fact our own government did.

[AlienEntity1]

@ResuEmanA Video? There's really only one video of the WTC 1 attack, the Naudet film.

Pentagon and gas station cameras are no good with 500mph planes. Slow frame rate.

[ResuEmanA]

I of course might not ever know the truth, but... the "what happened to the passengers" question is pretty irrelevant considering if our government were to commit such a crime, why would a few more people matter. Kidnap the people and swap out the planes for some bomb filled ones.

[AlienEntity1]

@ResuEmanA You can imagine all sorts of things, that doesn't mean it happened that way.

Fiction is nothing new... Hollywood movies have fantastical plots, but r they real?

[AlienEntity1]

@Lookitsbread btw, a word about 'falling into its footprint' - if this actually happened with WTC 7, how come it fell across 2 streets and did over $1.5 billion damage to the Verizon bldg and Fiterman Hall CUNY?

Unless you're arguing that the footprint included the streets and those buildings.... :jawdrop:

[AlienEntity1]

@Lookitsbread Sure thing - but a warning and prediction: you will avoid this evidence and disqualify it on some obscure grounds (ie move the goalpost). All truthers do this until they give up their delusions.

The building - CTV building in New Zealand collapsed completely into it's footprint, killing dozens, in Feb 2011.

There you go. And there are many other examples, which truthers also ignore. It's not hard to see why... :)

[Optimusprimemc1]

Don't worry about the like/dislike ratio. I've noticed that none of that proves a point to be truth or false. But the fact of the matter is, is that the people who like to accuse people of lying don't like to be called liars themselves. Great video.

[soulinite]

@AlienEntity1 A really terrible conspiracy blog called Whatreallyhappened*com

[AlienEntity1]

@ResuEmanA The Pentagon was heavily reinforced steel and concrete, the towers were remarkably light in construction. That's the main difference.

[AlienEntity1]

@ResuEmanA You ask questions but are you prepared, emotionally and intellectually, to accept straight answers?