The conspiracy of 9/11, Dutch television show, Part 3/6

Zembla: Het complot van 11 september.

The complete Dutch television show from 9/10 2006

This is the show where Danny Jowenko, the demolition expert, commented on the destruction of the three WTC buildings.

It also shows an inexperienced pilot who three times successfully accomplishes the task of hitting the Pentagon in a real commercial airline simulator.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Zembla
• Het
• complot
• van
• 11
• september
• 9/11
• Danny
• Jowenko
• Pentagon

[zilverenmist]

Wtc1 8:46:26 hit / collapse 10:28:25

Wtc2 9:02:59 hit / collapse 9:59:04

time difference between hits 16:34 (Approx.15 minutes)

Time difference collapse 29:21 (Approx. 30 minutes)

It can be called mechanical strange that the building that was last hit collapsed first!

Hypothesis: if planes flew in the wrong building it would theoretically explain the difference in the time of the collapse of the towers.

Or: the building was rigged, but the timers were set wrong.

[josarhus]

@zilverenmist Or the buildings were hit different.

The south tower was hit lower and more to the side. That give you two reasons why WTC 2 collapsed first, it had to support a much heavier load (more floors above impact) with a weaker structure (plane crash caused more destruction).

Nothing strange at all.

[zilverenmist]

@josarhus That is the mechanical problem, the core column was less damaged than at the first impact.

More logic for this constuction would have been to top off the top and fall sideward. the straight collapse can be calculated over and over again, but it miss the force and power to fall straight. Why are all explosions in the basement and lobby not mentioned in the 9/11 report? Why would a building hit in the side fall straght?

[josarhus]

@zilverenmist @zilverenmist At the impacted floors the perimeter wall carried about 50 percent of the load, and as the videos show, it was the perimeter wall that breaks down first, not the core. When the perimeter wall breaks down, all load is transferred to the core and then it starts to break down.

Dont forget that 95 percent or so of the volume of the buildings was air.

[josarhus]

@zilverenmist If the top was to fall down the side, you need to shift the center of gravity outside the perimeter wall that did not happen, far from. When the collapse starts the moving mass gains all the energy needed to fall straight down.

Again remember, that the buildings were primarily air.

Why the top does not fall to the side, is explained at page 250 here:

sites . google . com/site/911guide/drg_nist_rev­iew_2_1 . pdf

[josarhus]

@zilverenmist The buildings fell straight down because of gravity. What other force should have pushed them to the side?

The explosions are mentioned in the NIST report and are perfectly explained.

[zilverenmist]

@EllinonEnosis i.d.d. wie de media bezit bezit de "waarheid".

[zilverenmist]

@josarhus NIST has proven nothing, it only assumes.

[zilverenmist]

@josarhus watch?v=atSd7mxgsGY and watch?v=PSKcgYXoAzI proof otherwise. I have no reason to doubt Mr. Chandler on this. It also supports my own calculation. If it is right what you said, the concrete floors should have dropped right after the hit.

[wannaliveforever]

inside job - so obvious - people (sheeple) are blind