@MottTheWot And if you believe that pointing out the fallacy in your "argument" (it pains me to use that word for this garbage) is some how an "attack" you are just further incompetent in this discourse. I would hate to see you try and publish anything academically if you believe criticism to be an attack.
The only desperation here is your desperation to pretend that your government is wrong, and you are some how all knowledgeable in subjects it is clear you know nothing about. The only reason I humor such ignorance is to make sure people who happen to read such garbage don't have to be subjected to false presumptions alone.
@MottTheWot You assume I am some how politically affiliated with some form of liberal politics. This is a ridiculous accusation and unfounded. I have not been attacked, nor have you. I fail to see what your problem in understanding AGW is.
@MottTheWot If this still confuses you, I will lay it out perhaps a bit clearer: Discharge =/= to the potable water that can be retrieved from a stream. Processing capabilities of the treatment plant is the major determinant, except in cases of very low stream flow. No plant(s) in existence can treat and pump the quantities of water you presume possible.
@StAverti You're getting desperate now as the argument is getting too silly and absurd for me. You talk of reality? The far left live in a unreal world, living life how they'd like it to be not as it really is and there in lies the problem. Attacked by what? That in itself answers my questions.
@MottTheWot And you still haven't dealt with the fact that it is physically impossible to collect, treat and disseminate stream water in the quantities you are presuming. Address this before you continue attacking your Desal plant please.
@MottTheWot No those are single numbers that at bet represent overhead (again, they are out of context, so they are fairly useless). there was no consideration of potential gain, or lack there of from ancillary purposing.
@MottTheWot And if you believe that pointing out the fallacy in your "argument" (it pains me to use that word for this garbage) is some how an "attack" you are just further incompetent in this discourse. I would hate to see you try and publish anything academically if you believe criticism to be an attack.
StAverti 3 months ago
The only desperation here is your desperation to pretend that your government is wrong, and you are some how all knowledgeable in subjects it is clear you know nothing about. The only reason I humor such ignorance is to make sure people who happen to read such garbage don't have to be subjected to false presumptions alone.
StAverti 3 months ago
@MottTheWot You assume I am some how politically affiliated with some form of liberal politics. This is a ridiculous accusation and unfounded. I have not been attacked, nor have you. I fail to see what your problem in understanding AGW is.
StAverti 3 months ago
@MottTheWot If this still confuses you, I will lay it out perhaps a bit clearer: Discharge =/= to the potable water that can be retrieved from a stream. Processing capabilities of the treatment plant is the major determinant, except in cases of very low stream flow. No plant(s) in existence can treat and pump the quantities of water you presume possible.
StAverti 3 months ago
@StAverti You're getting desperate now as the argument is getting too silly and absurd for me. You talk of reality? The far left live in a unreal world, living life how they'd like it to be not as it really is and there in lies the problem. Attacked by what? That in itself answers my questions.
MottTheWot 3 months ago
@MottTheWot And you still haven't dealt with the fact that it is physically impossible to collect, treat and disseminate stream water in the quantities you are presuming. Address this before you continue attacking your Desal plant please.
StAverti 3 months ago
@MottTheWot No those are single numbers that at bet represent overhead (again, they are out of context, so they are fairly useless). there was no consideration of potential gain, or lack there of from ancillary purposing.
StAverti 3 months ago
@StAverti Made up numbers? That is the cost ...fact!
MottTheWot 3 months ago
@MottTheWot I am comfortable taking Australia's past back to the Cambrian if you like, or If you wanna really have fun, back to the Archean.
StAverti 3 months ago
@MottTheWot How early the fruit is falling this season.
MottTheWot 3 months ago