The Teleological/Anthropic Argument (3 arguments, Part 2)

This is the second in my short series where I show the obvious flaws in many theist arguments that supposedly prove God is real.

They don't, but wishful thinking combined with a lack of education is a powerful thing.

(I think I did a better job on this one than the last)

Category:

Education

Tags:

• cosmological
• argument
• atheist
• christian
• muslim
• jewish
• god
• creation
• big
• bang
• flaw
• illogical
• anthropic
• teleological
• logic

[mjdoyza]

But didn't Einstein argue that time can be altered relative to the location of the observer?

[CroBob]

Didn't you ask this same question, which I then answered in a comment on my last video?

Yes. Yes, you did. And I answered your question. Now I'll ask you; What's the relevance?

[CarmineFragione]

If Universes happen randomly, you have never seen another universe happening randomly and so you have no evidence possible. But if intelligent people can create another feasible universe and it's own time, then that becomes the only testable and falsifiable answer likely. For an intelligent creature to make another world proves that in the absence of Nature causing any other worlds to begin and own time, then Intelligence must preexist any definable universe, since "Nature" does nothing new

[Sines314]

That was kinda awesome, pity you don't make videos anymore ^_^.

Nice choice of music in your videos too.

[mtambors]

that is in no way relevant to this argument or the first one.

[mtambors]

maybe god got his engineering degree from liberty university...that would explain everything!!!