Richard Dawkins' Confusion About the Multiverse
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (drcraigvideos)
Top Comments
-
The multiverse theory must be appealing for a man who desires a universe in which his ideas make sense.
1 year ago 21
All Comments (65)
-
Richard Dawkins is brilliant explorer of genetics but he knows nothing about the Universe. Sometimes he acts funny when he argues about the topics he does not understand. Regarding the Multiverse: the problem is simple. all this buzz with multiple Universes was "invented" because the academic sciense can not explain our single Universe. So on Dr. Craig! Shoot them all!
2 months ago 2
-
The multiverse theory is just ridiculous!
-
If there is a multiverse doesn't there have to be universes where God does exist and did create everything? Seems the multiverse argument can't explain anything because if everything that can be is, then everything is possible. It solves nothing.
-
Anyway, I think that's enough citations to make my point. He's been publishing articles in science and philosophy journals and texts for years, all the while being reviewed by his peers on his work and ideas.
-
2000: "The Tenseless Theory of Time: A Critical Examination." Synthese Library
2000: “The Anthropic Principle.” In The History of Science and Religion in the Western Tradition: an Encyclopedia
2000: “ Relativity and the ‘Elimination’ of Absolute Time.” In Recent Advances in Relativity Theory.
2001: “Prof. Grünbaum on the ‘Normalcy of Nothingness’ in the Leibnizian and Kalam Cosmological Arguments.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
-
1992: “God and the Initial Cosmological Singularity: A Reply to Quentin Smith.” Faith and Philosophy
1998: “The Tensed vs. Tenseless Theory of Time: A Watershed for the Conception of Divine Eternity.” In Questions of Time and Tense (a textbook)
1999: “The Ultimate Question of Origins: God and the Beginning of the Universe.” Astrophysics and Space Science
2000: "The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination." Synthese Library
-
1988: “Barrow and Tipler on the Anthropic Principle vs. Divine Design.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
1990: “‘What Place, Then, for a Creator?’: Hawking on God and Creation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
1991: “Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy
1992: “The Origin and Creation of the Universe: a Reply to Adolf Grünbaum.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
-
@mikestead He is a recognized philosopher of time and science, he has an extensive publication history on the philosophy of science and religion; all peer-reviewed and vetted.
1979:“Whitrow and Popper on the Impossibility of an Infinite Past.” in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
1979: “Wallace Matson and the Crude Cosmological Argument.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy
-
'The question still stands : What qualifies him to comment on maths, physics or cosmology. '
You don't need qualifications to speak a truth.
-
- 3:32
Dr. William Lane Craig refutes Dawkins on the Presumption of Atheism and Russell's Tea Potby MrZazomy6,522 views
- 2:37
William Lane Craig refutes Richard Dawkins - Are we all atheists many times over?by MrZazomy3,207 views
- 16:28
Andrew Copson Tries to Smear William Lane Craig with Dishonestyby drcraigvideos10,558 views
- 3:13
Richard Dawkins' Ignorance of the Oscillating Universeby drcraigvideos2,327 views
- 9:18
(2/3) Richard Dawkins on the Late Late Showby wwwloymachedocom23,745 views
- 1:16
Was Hitler a Christian? (William Lane Craig and Richard Dawkins)by MrZazomy5,506 views
- 1:52
What About Evil and Multiverses in Context of the Ontological Argument?by drcraigvideos1,246 views
- 6:23
Michio Kaku on the Multiverse (Part 1 of 6) Interview with the Conscious Media Networkby mkaku205030,116 views
- 1:01
The Wit of Dr. Craig - Part 9 "Evolution Loves God"by drcraigvideos14,511 views
- 5:58
Dinesh D'Souza on Richard Dawkinsby antybu8621,498 views
- 5:40
The Ontological Argumentby drcraigvideos7,011 views
- 4:44
Does Evolution Disprove Christianity?by drcraigvideos10,635 views
- 2:00
How Can an Eternal God Create a Temporal Effect?by drcraigvideos1,742 views
- 2:22
Is naturalism the same as science?by drcraigvideos1,068 views
- 5:13
17. Is Intelligent Design Viable?: Q&Aby drcraigvideos775 views
- 1:13
Don't Virtual Particles Prove Something Can Come From Nothing?by drcraigvideos4,827 views
- 10:50
Richard Dawkins' Central Argument Refuted 1/3by drcraigvideos4,395 views
- 3:49
What about the Oscillating Universe?by drcraigvideos981 views
- 4:40
Oscillating Modelsby drcraigvideos714 views
- 1:14
The Sloppy Scholarship of Intelligent Design Criticsby drcraigvideos1,891 views
I did some reading, in the 15 minutes since I asked the question... Dr. Craigs arguments can be traced to medieval Jewish, Christian and Muslim thinkers, but most directly to Islamic theologians of the Kalām tradition. Its historic proponents include Al-Kindi, Saadia Gaon, Al-Ghazali.
mikestead 6 months ago
@mikestead Uhm, okay. Gee, Dr. Craig has only been telling people that he defends the KALAM cosmological argument and that it came from Al Ghazali among other people. What's your point?
drcraigvideos 6 months ago
Dr. Craig ,Is what kind of Doctor?He is setting limits as per HIS,"MANS" understanding,Which is indeed lacking.The simplistic Atom,is the same simplicity found in a solar system and galaxy,why not multi?Could be,is more likely than not.BUT this CLOWN,KNOWS BETTER. I can really see in history,someone just like him saying,"WE KNOW that the earth is FLAT.It's proven.And some fools are saying that it is round.HUMAN-BIG mouth,small brain.
billy1212ist 7 months ago
@billy1212ist "Dr. Craig ,Is what kind of Doctor?" He has a PhD in theology and a PhD in philosophy, genius. And Dr. Craig has dealt with the multiverse if you would only listen to the video, you'll know that's the case.
drcraigvideos 7 months ago
Fact is: Multiverse theory demolishes the teleological argument, and no amount of speaking by Craig will change that. Recently, Stephen Hawking has moved towards that position, and I'm gonna take his word on it, not Craig's ...
djbanizza 1 year ago
@djbanizza So since your God (Stephen Hawking) says so you JUST know so, huh? Typical. Anyway, you haven't even begun to comment on this video. Why ignore evidence?
drcraigvideos 1 year ago 7