As an educator, I find it extremely hard to reach all the children's needs. They all learn very differently and at different levels. I think having this type of program is great. We can evaluate the data (which we always to anyway) and evaluate who needs remediation and who can move forward (advanced) -without 20+ hours/week. It's like having a one to one educator working with each student. That is impossible in the classroom now a day. I personally, like it.
Btw state standards are the very problem, standardization is the opposite of where learning should be. It the paradigm shift in teaching that should be addressed.
Mind inflow is actually correct, coming from a high school senior, this won't change anything. The only thing it proves is that if a machine can replace a teachers it should. But that doesn't mean that the machine is the best thing for the student themselves. A computer won't change anything. A different way of thinking for students from the beginning will. Children have natural inclinations that schools beat out of them from the first day of indoctrination. I did and lost it if I hadn't had a
@mindinflow Oh? LOL I bet you see conspiracies everywhere don't you? In that case, there's nothing I can say to you because your mind seems a bit brainwashed as well. Take care.
this is optional .
nelrish24 3 months ago
As an educator, I find it extremely hard to reach all the children's needs. They all learn very differently and at different levels. I think having this type of program is great. We can evaluate the data (which we always to anyway) and evaluate who needs remediation and who can move forward (advanced) -without 20+ hours/week. It's like having a one to one educator working with each student. That is impossible in the classroom now a day. I personally, like it.
addiedoug100 3 months ago
For some this might be solution for some it might not be. There is no right or wrong answer
FsimulatorX 5 months ago
Btw state standards are the very problem, standardization is the opposite of where learning should be. It the paradigm shift in teaching that should be addressed.
HumansPersonified 1 year ago
Mind inflow is actually correct, coming from a high school senior, this won't change anything. The only thing it proves is that if a machine can replace a teachers it should. But that doesn't mean that the machine is the best thing for the student themselves. A computer won't change anything. A different way of thinking for students from the beginning will. Children have natural inclinations that schools beat out of them from the first day of indoctrination. I did and lost it if I hadn't had a
HumansPersonified 1 year ago
You can throw my message over board by sayin it is conspiracy
but just think about it machines sovlin problems is not the way we want to educate are children in.
You can disciminate my way of thinking but if you dont have any arguments than your the one thats brainwashed.
Tell me why is it better when our kids have computers in there classrooms with programs that will teach them how the world operates ?
We can discuss but if your igonrant about the things i say theres nothing left to discuss
mindinflow 1 year ago
@mindinflow Oh? LOL I bet you see conspiracies everywhere don't you? In that case, there's nothing I can say to you because your mind seems a bit brainwashed as well. Take care.
grs9769 1 year ago
@grs9769 Yeah right i think you dont know shit about the plans that the elite of the world have.
Believe me this is propaganda, given are children more machines is not the solution.
mindinflow 1 year ago
@mindinflow This is saying much more than that. Great name, but I think your mind is flowing down the toilet.
grs9769 1 year ago
this is bull shit.
brainwashing by computers is not the answer
mindinflow 1 year ago