07 GSXR1000, slip-on pipe, not tuned, 145lb good rider VS 813rwhp MKIV 6speed Supra on C16 30psi, 74GTS turbo, stock motor
Supra dyno sheet
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y49/spooledup/My%20Cars/Supra/IMG_7814.jpg
Last race in video is actually the first race, edited to look like the last race. All runs were at the same boost level for the Supra. Supra has no horn so GSXR was waiting for it, Supra went for it, got off and back in it and played catch-up.
All races from ~50mph. 1st gear for bike, 2nd for Supra to about 160mph
Bike has gone 10.15@140and Supra 11.000@134 on same setup as video
Elevation is at 5200', so NA bike loses alot of power up here
fucking supra se lo piso al invecil negro salvadorean
misperros16 2 weeks ago
@RobAlpacaflip hey a man with few words hmmm. that pretty sums it all up LOL..
rottepung666 2 months ago
@rottepung666 You are stupid.
RobAlpacaflip 2 months ago
fantastic vid
fightscienceful 4 months ago
@almst1 but the point is that bike will out accelerate a car even with a lower PTWR but they will lose @ top speed.. but then again you can re-gear them for higher speed.. but who cares about top speed when you lose anyway... i raced a koeniggsegg or whaeva his name is=) and the top speed of that is 240mph+ but by the time he got up to speed that he could past me i was already home sleeping with his wife C",)
rottepung666 5 months ago
@almst1 but the point is that bike will out accelerate a car even with a lower PTWR but they will lose @ top speed.. but then again you can re-gear them for higher speed.. but who cares about top speed when you lose anyway... i raced a koeniggsegg or whaeva his name is=) and the top speed of that is 240mph+ but by the time he got up to speed that he could past me i was already home sleeping with his wife C",)
rottepung666 5 months ago
@almst1 i am a mma fighter weighing 210lbs so with me on the bike the bike would have the disadvantage.. i have a bike a suzuki gsx-r 1000 K5 with 235bhp 202rwhp and 132rwNM my friend is 40lbs down on me and when he tried it, it was nearly 3 sec faster to 0-186.5mph =) so yes weight is fucking crucial on a bike not to mention that you are less aerodynmaic then small ppl.. and aerodynmaic is the most important thing @ least if you`re doing top speed run..or 0-186 0-200mph run..
rottepung666 5 months ago
@rottepung666 If your have a 160lb rider/driver in both vehicles, the bikes power to weight is 3.8lb/hp while the cars is 3.9lbs/hp. I understand that the bikes power to weight decreases significantly as rider weight increases but the bike should still have the advantage until the rider weighs over 180ish. Both vehicles are stupid fast, but cars require lots of money just to be able to keep up with a liter. If you turbo a liter bike.........
almst1 5 months ago
@almst1 ok you did forget a MAJOR fact the rider and the driver not that it`s important in a car since it`s heavy load but on a bike it has a lot to say.why do all ppl think that a bike will run for it self while there doing PTWR math.when i sit my ass on the bike the load raises with over 50% of the bike weight and then the PTWR isn`t as good as ppl think..it`s still fast as fuck.so if i sat on this bike it would have 510bhp/per ton and car 580bhp/per ton.so actually the car would have the edge
rottepung666 5 months ago
@doberoner Slick how in the race around the 1:30 second range of your video you keep slowly accelerating to get up to a higher speed so the car has the advantage in HP, then you jump the bike right after that. Why not start at a 25-30mph roll?
bicycless211 6 months ago