3.4L Camaro 100+

Modded V6 Camaro 0 to 100

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• 3.4L
• Camaro

[kabeto001]

hp??

[Alldaysteve1]

Around 200hp I like to think with the AC delete 160 stat K&N TB mods No cat and Jet stage 2 chip I should have picked up around 40 for everything.

[isphius]

not worth 40 hp. These motors gain 40 hp from head/cam/headers not just a few bolt ons. Not trying to be rude just letting you know

[Alldaysteve1]

If not, really close like I said around 200hp if not maybe 190Hp but I know no less.

stock 160

No cat 10

Jet chip 15

K&N 5

TB work/ AC delete 5

[merkkraft4]

not bad for 150k+

[Smokie420ish]

@GPVlog 3.8L L36 series 2

[Smokie420ish]

@GPVlog They didn't put the 3.8L in at the time because GM didn't have it in production for a RWD platform yet. You may say that had a 3.8L in the 85 vGrand National but that is a completely different engine than the L36 series two 3.8L which produces a lot less emissions which all the big auto makers were trying to do at the time was lower emissions like CO2, HC, NOX,CO,etc... for the mandated OBD2 set by the Government. That is why this L32 3.4L drop off the face of the earth in 96 with the

[Smokie420ish]

@6453103 Actually no this 3.4L is a L32 V6 compared to the LA1 or the LQ1 you are referring to. Completely different engines bud. The whole top ends of each engine is different especially the LQ1 which is a Dual Over Head Cam(DOHC) compared to the other two which are a CIB.

[Smokie420ish]

@wcbrookinz101 also after doing all that performance upgrades on a V6 good luck on our trans lasting and drive shaft not snapping. Those flimsy two piece drive shafts are crap and a V6 T5 and V6 4L60-E are not built the same as a V8s transmission. The V8 transmissions have stronger flex plates and TC and clutches to handle the more tq

[Smokie420ish]

@wcbrookinz101 No you wouldn't you would have to pay someone to retune your pcm, and a S/C will add more drag on an engine and will cause the reliability to go down. Why do you think performance cars and make and manufacturers have a 3yr/36,000 mile warranty compared to a reliable fuel economy's car that has a 10 year/100k warranty. Performance cost money. Also you may get the same speed and accel but the power bands between the two are way different(night and day)

[MrTex1987]

take a pencil, coil a wire around it a bunch of times, stick one end on the positive terminal on your starter, and ground the other to your frame. Youll get 8% better gas mileage. Quick way to change the frequency of the motor. Also, in any modern stock motor, only burns about 20-30% of the gas it gets... There are 2 sparks in a cycle, the second ignites the negative energy, imploding it, causing the piston to be sucked back up for the next cycle.

[Duddie82]

I just brought my 1994 3.4 Camaro, It is going to be FUN driving that car,, I love the look, and engine sound, it is very Bad A&&

[carsnwomen91]

@Djonemore they're designed to be a lot more effecient and keep the engine in the right powerband for the right situation. u can hardly notice the shifting too and the shifting is a lot smoother than of a camaro

[Djonemore]

Man, I love the long gears they put in these things, not like todays 6-7 autos that are constantly shifting....