@albedoshader watch?v=qJ11i6fi7KQ shows your "hollow WTC". there were 47 central load bearing spines, all connected together with welds, bolts. the base dimensions were 4.5ftx2ft tapering to 3.6ftx1.5ft to 3ftx1.25ft with a Huge hat truss on top. It was compromised:: We see the antenna fall First. watch?v=6HOTAUy_mrQ shows the WTC in 3D. watch?v=__gUjUv1vvw is a documentary made at the time of the construction of the WTC. You watch those and we'll talk again about "Hollow Buildings"
@albedoshader: Yo may have exposed Mormonism but surely you’re not qualified to expose any form of alleged mechanical or civil engineering conspiracy.
@IExposeMormonism: Science in the form of FEM is based on experiments, physics and logic—unless there’s a global conspiracy against mechanical engineers. Have you ever done any FEM analysis yourself or learned about it first hand? I have. The WTC towers were virtually hollow buildings, a short look at the technical drawings makes this immediately clear. The only parts that could absorb the kinetic energy of the plane effectively were inside the towers—the concrete floors.
@albedoshader Science in the form of cartoons is ruining simple logic. If you freeze frame this cartoon as the tail goes in, the plane do a little curtsy, the only way it would fit. And the way the wing tips, edges, tail and all just slip into the WTC is, well,unique. And having a plane explode not on impact but only After it's Fully inside, that was a nice touch, too. But how the plane entered the WTC without any de-acceleration is odd. Even a 'bunker buster' missile should slow a little
i seen that before on Remembering 9/11 tv show!
gocountry1391 1 month ago
whats is the music called on here?
CuddleBunE 4 months ago
@albedoshader watch?v=qJ11i6fi7KQ shows your "hollow WTC". there were 47 central load bearing spines, all connected together with welds, bolts. the base dimensions were 4.5ftx2ft tapering to 3.6ftx1.5ft to 3ftx1.25ft with a Huge hat truss on top. It was compromised:: We see the antenna fall First. watch?v=6HOTAUy_mrQ shows the WTC in 3D. watch?v=__gUjUv1vvw is a documentary made at the time of the construction of the WTC. You watch those and we'll talk again about "Hollow Buildings"
IExposeMormonism 4 months ago
@albedoshader: Yo may have exposed Mormonism but surely you’re not qualified to expose any form of alleged mechanical or civil engineering conspiracy.
albedoshader 4 months ago
@IExposeMormonism: Science in the form of FEM is based on experiments, physics and logic—unless there’s a global conspiracy against mechanical engineers. Have you ever done any FEM analysis yourself or learned about it first hand? I have. The WTC towers were virtually hollow buildings, a short look at the technical drawings makes this immediately clear. The only parts that could absorb the kinetic energy of the plane effectively were inside the towers—the concrete floors.
albedoshader 4 months ago
@albedoshader Science in the form of cartoons is ruining simple logic. If you freeze frame this cartoon as the tail goes in, the plane do a little curtsy, the only way it would fit. And the way the wing tips, edges, tail and all just slip into the WTC is, well,unique. And having a plane explode not on impact but only After it's Fully inside, that was a nice touch, too. But how the plane entered the WTC without any de-acceleration is odd. Even a 'bunker buster' missile should slow a little
IExposeMormonism 4 months ago
@IExposeMormonism: Oh, sweet social envy—the best argument against scientific work.
albedoshader 4 months ago
@CHRodz: If you would have watched the original video with the comments you wouldn’t write a comment like this one. Well—you would anyway, I think.
albedoshader 4 months ago
And what’s supposed to be so flawed about this simulation? The only thing flawed is the music used for this video.
albedoshader 4 months ago
it's like a huge cock going into a tight virgin asshole :D
plotchickens 4 months ago