Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 - 3D Virtual WTC Impact

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
28,997
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 21, 2008

how much do u trust anyone ? this media was rendered using supercomputing however its so flawed...

thanx dude!
http://livevideo.com/spineyextra


http://911Revolution.magnify.net

http://911taboo.magnify.net

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to No Planes In New York
see all

All Comments (94)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i seen that before on Remembering 9/11 tv show!

  • whats is the music called on here?

  • @albedoshader watch?v=qJ11i6fi7KQ shows your "hollow WTC". there were 47 central load bearing spines, all connected together with welds, bolts. the base dimensions were 4.5ftx2ft tapering to 3.6ftx1.5ft to 3ftx1.25ft with a Huge hat truss on top. It was compromised:: We see the antenna fall First. watch?v=6HOTAUy_mrQ shows the WTC in 3D. watch?v=__gUjUv1vvw is a documentary made at the time of the construction of the WTC. You watch those and we'll talk again about "Hollow Buildings"

  • @albedoshader: Yo may have exposed Mormonism but surely you’re not qualified to expose any form of alleged mechanical or civil engineering conspiracy.

  • @IExposeMormonism: Science in the form of FEM is based on experiments, physics and logic—unless there’s a global conspiracy against mechanical engineers. Have you ever done any FEM analysis yourself or learned about it first hand? I have. The WTC towers were virtually hollow buildings, a short look at the technical drawings makes this immediately clear. The only parts that could absorb the kinetic energy of the plane effectively were inside the towers—the concrete floors.

  • @albedoshader Science in the form of cartoons is ruining simple logic. If you freeze frame this cartoon as the tail goes in, the plane do a little curtsy, the only way it would fit. And the way the wing tips, edges, tail and all just slip into the WTC is, well,unique. And having a plane explode not on impact but only After it's Fully inside, that was a nice touch, too. But how the plane entered the WTC without any de-acceleration is odd. Even a 'bunker buster' missile should slow a little

  • @IExposeMormonism: Oh, sweet social envy—the best argument against scientific work.

  • @CHRodz: If you would have watched the original video with the comments you wouldn’t write a comment like this one. Well—you would anyway, I think.

  • And what’s supposed to be so flawed about this simulation? The only thing flawed is the music used for this video.

  • it's like a huge cock going into a tight virgin asshole :D

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more