Synthetic Biology: Drew Endy
Top Comments
All Comments (29)
-
Great ideas! Thanks to wired for posting!
-
@qwizzer78 Fuck nature. Science is golden.
-
I brought up a legitimate point and you respond with idiotic ad hominem attacks. Congratulations, you're a master debater.
-
@3Gyro Keep playing your video games and mom will bring you supper soon child. Did you remember to take out the trash son?
-
One word: Dumb!
"Ok so yeah this one company is evil so the ENTIRE BRANCH OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT they use is pure evil too, it's a logic!"
-
@trickyoutrickme ok well, my definition is really more of a realistic and quoted from either ocw.mit.edu or webcast.berkeley.edu lecture, I believe berkeley can't remember this was so long ago. So for my purposes nanotech being something real and not fairytale is fine.
-
Wrong. Nanotech is the purposeful placement of atoms and could easily "not fit" in your 100 nanometers definition. On the other hand, the current STATISTICAL placement of atoms, even is easily fitting in your 100 nanometers thin definition, is NOT nanotechnology.
-
@LikeAPossum actually biology is not the only nanotech depending on your defnition of nanotech. certain consumer cpu's are technically nanotech. Nanotechnology is mereley any system or device where the entire thing fits in 100 or less nanometers.
could easily save or destroy the human race.
rat5522 3 years ago 5
hopefully the first one
zakkmiester 3 years ago 2