I was bored so i decided to kill a ramar, i mean, it's not that hard anyway. :P
I know RAmar char has advantages and that he is good in some aspects, but since ppl complain alot that humars aren't good at anything then i decided to show what they are good at.
Yes, RAmars are good, just in GC and Blue Burst.
LawClash 4 months ago
A glowing endorsement.
"HUmars: Not RAmars!"
Xick 4 months ago
RichardD124 umm I beat falz at level 28 and only healed like 4 times... And you can't do better then 35?
wolfanator81 6 months ago
@RichardD124
I know this is late, but acually the recommended level to beat falz on hard is level 50. And even at that point it IS pretty hard to do. Especially if you dont have very good special weaps or none at all.
ultimatezeldaplayer 1 year ago
@KIREEKPSO haha i didnt imply this at all good sir it's just that the recommended level to beat him on hard is 40 and i usually beat him easy at 35 or so, therefore at lv 52 he would kill him easy
RichardD124 1 year ago
@RichardD124
Because at lvl 52 it's possible to do so much damage that you kill falz in 1 hit right?
KIREEKPSO 1 year ago
@KIREEKPSO 1:I don't care if u block me 2:why improve survival ability if he's going to pwn him anyway
RichardD124 1 year ago
@RichardD124
that's obvious, however you never said what could be done to improve survivability.
One more insult and you will be blocked, consider yourself warned.
KIREEKPSO 1 year ago
@808FLIPpinoy in my opinion the best character is a tie for ramar and hucast but for your hucast if he has at least OK weps he is going to eat Dark Falz alive without the need of anything this retard KIREEKPSO says
RichardD124 1 year ago
Ramars are good if you use them but they suck in the black paper quest. :P
Ub3rpr1nny 1 year ago