Wireless Protest

Some from the phone industry.

Others from universities, the National Science Foundation, the Royal Academy, the government.

This is one of the most heavily studied subjects and ALL data from well controlled studies indicates zero risk from low power RF sources. This is not new either. UHF and microwave radiation goes back to and has been studied since the end of world war II

The effects of dialectric heating, eddy currents and so on are very well understood.

Start with an article I wrote for the Townsend Letter. A copy is available on my website, which I can't actually give you because YouTube blocks it, but it is yourownhealthandfitness dot org forward slash Documents forward slash Fawcett>TheWiFiBlues dot pdf. There are lots of references there to both research and websites.

i don't know what fawcett> is

"Fawcett" is my last name. ">" is just a marker that separates it from the title. If you just go to the website, you'll see a link to it on the right under "What's New." The title is "The WiFi Blues." Try it. You'll like it.

Also, I loved:

"What do you make of the argument that this will close the digital divide?"
"People who think that need to get on the internet and download these reports from 'overseas'".

Having said all this, there *should* be an environmental and health review. Mind you, if they don't know what the impact of the mobile phone masts is, I don't see how they can make a call on these ones.