Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

911 Truth Loose change 2nd edition 9/11 Documentary Full length

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,689
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 29, 2011

911 Truth

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • It annoies me that we are all being with held from the truth i am not from America but I still want the truth for the families of the dead

  • Bin Laden was on dialysis and was in the mountains: where did he get the stuff from to keep him alive ?? he died in them mountains a long time ago !! also he always sent video recordings of himself; why were only audio recordings his last messages to his faithful ??? he couldn't afford a camera with video settings ??

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @n00g75 I haven't found one controlled demolition expert who says WTC7 collapsed like a typical controlled demolition. If it was done by controlled demolition, then why did the FDNY establish a collapse zone TWO HOURS prior to the collapse? Were they in on it?

  • @brassbonanza97 so to u its plausible that a building where u cant see much flames like at wtc7.its more smoke then any thing else.and havent u seen the fire at that skyscr. in the video i gave ya .. it was completly totally under fire for 24h. and didnt collaps. not even to mention that it collapsed perfectly like at a controlled demolition. why do blaster need to do all the groundwork if u could simply crush a building with fire.americans dont thrust the goverment.but this is impossible 2 u?

  • @n00g75 1.) show me a time in history when a Boeing 767 slammed into one of the tallest skyscrapers in the world.

    2.) WTC7 had unfought fires on almost every floor, per the FDNY. These fires burned for 7+ hours without being fought. They FDNY KNEW fire would bring it down, as well, the building was scooped out a little and titled from the collapse of WTC1. This is all reported by the FDNY.

  • @brassbonanza97 if u believe that .. then u could provide any link to an video, report, newspaper that reported one? and pls .. i dont mean any indian or turkish skyscraper that would also collaps after u slam closed 2 door at the same time( but even there i havent found just 1) . i mean real solid skyscrapers just like in the states that collaps because of an fire. i bet u cant. wtc7 proves it. /watch?v=wkt9-Cv63nM&feature=p­layer_embedded#! btw. thats a REAL fire!!!

  • @n00g75 Yes, because the guide specifically says you can destroy a towering skyscrapper with just fire. Nevermind the fact that a Boeing 767 crashed into it, separating some very important beams.

  • @n00g75 and finally .. why the gov. simply dont realase all the material the con about ?

  • @brassbonanza97 lol oh arguments from both sides right ? i would say i got information from that other side all day long on tv and radio and newspapers and i cant take this so call "guide" serious. so i really can crack down a skyscraper when i start a fire ? good to know for an terrorist. i can save all the air plan highjacking he could get like 30 buckets of gas and a lighter and fuck it up himself. this guid is pure bs!!!

  • @bhoffer1994 You should read Mark Roberts' work on 9/11 and on Loose Change. He has cited evidence and real truth.

  • @77qpid Where's your evidence?

  • I suggest everybody Google "Loose Change Viewers Guide" to go along with this movie so you actually get arguments from BOTH sides, and not just one.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more