'Why Evolution Is True' Jerry Coyne, Richard Dawkins
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (3)
-
@danmcc22 I suggest you read this very excellent book before posting stupid shit about 'ireducable complexity' that nobody thinks is an accurate representation of the facts other than people that carry bibles under their arms on Sunday mornings.
-
Natural selection can not explain the irreducable complexity found even in very "simple" life and thus the speaker's own statement "it becomes fact only when nothing refutes it" has been triggered. He also sites a disproof of evolution as "adaptations that could not have evolved by a step-by-step process." Maybe the rotary motor in flagellum? Thus even by his definition, evolution is in big trouble. That said, I think he also does a pretty good job of refuting a single creation event. Now what?
o_O Was this about a scientific theory or what?!!
Faith vs Social dysfunction... lolllll.. Read Islamic history "golden ages"..
My simple question is: why humans lost their body hair to come later and replace it with clothes..?
SIX9O6XIS 1 month ago 6