If I was a cameraman in the army photo-film division,20-25 years old,raised and believed in Jesus and God and all the bullshit about religion and then witnessing gray aliens dead and alive wailking,blinking I would also shake ,tremble and record like shit..moreover I would also piss on my pants.
@chapiit08 you are talking quality, i'm telling you only the good quality images goes for the public on tv and such, you dont pay to see a blurry plane being shot down, or white outs in the film, do you ? the propaganda and guncam pictures had good film, war photographer and filmmakers used bad quality film, the good ones you see are the ones from armed force for propaganda,thats why real combat pictures looks kinda blurry,or with many white outs.But on this video, its fake as hell
@bladerj You mean that combat footage is also fake? Perhaps staged? I know that for certain propaganda films, some combat scenes are staged, but many are not and still are better than most of the UFO footage. Perhaps the subjects shouldn't be compared, but it's what came to mind. I understand that combat footage is usually filmed by professionals whereas UFO, Sasquatch, etc. footage is taken by amateurs. But hey, I was just throwing out an idea, if you know more please, enlighten me.
Why is it that this type of 'evidence' footage, whether it is UFO, Sasquatch, or whatever allways is blurry and off focus? Weird, considering that most combat footage, which is filmed under the worst possible conditions, is usually crisp and clear.
@knowlegdeispower100 CHECK OUT ALEX .. HUMAN ALIEN HYBRID, BORN 3000 YEARS AGO
counteralien 4 weeks ago
If I was a cameraman in the army photo-film division,20-25 years old,raised and believed in Jesus and God and all the bullshit about religion and then witnessing gray aliens dead and alive wailking,blinking I would also shake ,tremble and record like shit..moreover I would also piss on my pants.
nedretkilic 1 month ago
@bladerj iam a believer of aliens and ufos I only say that they had better cameras in the fiftys [;
knowlegdeispower100 1 month ago
@chapiit08 you are talking quality, i'm telling you only the good quality images goes for the public on tv and such, you dont pay to see a blurry plane being shot down, or white outs in the film, do you ? the propaganda and guncam pictures had good film, war photographer and filmmakers used bad quality film, the good ones you see are the ones from armed force for propaganda,thats why real combat pictures looks kinda blurry,or with many white outs.But on this video, its fake as hell
bladerj 1 month ago
@bladerj You mean that combat footage is also fake? Perhaps staged? I know that for certain propaganda films, some combat scenes are staged, but many are not and still are better than most of the UFO footage. Perhaps the subjects shouldn't be compared, but it's what came to mind. I understand that combat footage is usually filmed by professionals whereas UFO, Sasquatch, etc. footage is taken by amateurs. But hey, I was just throwing out an idea, if you know more please, enlighten me.
chapiit08 1 month ago
@knowlegdeispower100 cameras aren't everything ,it was the film that makes or breaks, and due to war the good ones were only used by military.
bladerj 1 month ago
@chapiit08 the ones revealed to the pulic are crisp clear, did you see any that wasnt ? yeaaaaaaaah, guess why ?
bladerj 1 month ago
If this is fake, it's a pretty damn good fake.
TheOzeezos 1 month ago
Why is it that this type of 'evidence' footage, whether it is UFO, Sasquatch, or whatever allways is blurry and off focus? Weird, considering that most combat footage, which is filmed under the worst possible conditions, is usually crisp and clear.
chapiit08 1 month ago
Looks real too me. But if its not then it's a real good fake. Good job if it is or isn't .
Killstrike6660 1 month ago