Michael Shermer Jonathan Wells Evolution Debate [6 of 7]
Top Comments
All Comments (88)
-
Many scientists have started completely ignoring ID so as to strip it of any sort of credibility. Sadly, this means that there are fewer and fewer of these debates to watch. I love watching these debates, so in that respect, I am somewhat sad. ID is so hamfistedly idiotic that I can't even begin to fathom why even the most slightly intelligent person could buy into it. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
-
@parasitesarefunny Nice trolling bro, I give you a 1/DERP.
-
Michael Shermer = Liar and Deceiver
He LIES about the Holocaust Fraud
He LIES about 9/11
He LIES about Plate Tectonics
He LIES about Macro Evolution
I can only guess he also LIES about Global Warming and the Moon Walk Hoax
For those who are aware of Global Events, Michael Shermer is proof positive evidence that this LIAR has an agenda to spread dis-information.
-
Well ID is one thing, but to claim that it is scientifically plausible is bizarre to say the least.
-
Ok now I'm pissed.. he used Tyrannosaurids as the example for avian dinosaurs. Hey asshole ever hear of dromaeosaurs?? They had feathers AND long arms. What a LIAR
-
I don't know why there are even debates about this. ID is utter crap and has no scientific support whatsoever.
-
Only the trex had short hands, raptors had hands long enough for quadrupedalism, and the real ancestors of birds are small light dinosaurs like microraptors - almost equal front and back legs, slim and slender, living among tress and jumping from branch to branch - there is no question of credulity that way, is there?
-
Wells is so nervous - he drank water close to a dozen times, michael took only a sip maybe.
-
Wells had to pull back from Id to critical to dont teach Id yet. Its only a matter of time b4 it has to be pulled back all the way - Id is flase.
-
Wells is a nasty piece of work.
No, most of what he has come out with have been lies or mistakes. I think he is the last thing anyone fears
Also no one is afraid darwinism is wrong. The scientific method thrives on being shown where its wrong. If its wrong we WANT someone to show it
Science is a field where people win for showing where they and others are wrong by forwarding truths that usurp previously held truths. All of science operates on this so you cannot establish this bias against being wrong
irishmauddib 3 years ago 25
"Father's [Sun Myung Moon's] words, my studies, and my prayers convinced me that I should devote my life to destroying Darwinism, just as many of my fellow Unificationists had already devoted their lives to destroying Marxism. When Father chose me (along with about a dozen other seminary graduates) to enter a Ph.D. program in 1978, I welcomed the opportunity to prepare myself for battle." --Jonathan Wells, Darwinism: Why I Went for a Second Ph.D. -- Wells is a biased nut-job. From wikipedia.
generationalist 3 years ago 6