Rep.Clyburn enjoys being interviewed.
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (janhelfeld)
Top Comments
-
You're the best interviewer there is, Jan!
2 years ago 4
All Comments (18)
-
Please post more of your interviews. They are extremely educational.
-
Two contradictions--often stated in some fashion--are that (1) taxing aside, governments still have to initiate force in order to prevent other "protection agencies" from competing with them. Providing retaliatory force is a service, not a crime, so why should a government forcefully be granted a monopoly on it? Also, (2) who settles disputes between people from different countries? Taken to its logical conclusion, the "ultimate arbiter" concept implies world government.
-
I agree. Jan's argument was really weak. Especially the argument about the relocation of people (by force) who don't want a state.
-
you lost the debate. deal with it.
- 3:53Stephanopoulos Clams Up When Questioned on Racismby janhelfeld21,926 views
- 2:39Rep. Collins on Racial Discriminationby janhelfeld3,513 views
- 4:59Clyburn "It's fine to discriminate"by janhelfeld6,818 views
- 3:08stupid Rep Clyburn Tricksby yidwithlid476 views
- 9:48Rep. De La Garza on supply and demand, subsidie...by janhelfeld1,847 views
- 2:42Rep. Hoeffel Calls Jan an A-Holeby janhelfeld4,762 views
- 7:54Congressman Barney Frank discussing Minimum Wageby janhelfeld10,727 views
- 1:47Broder Contradicts Himselfby janhelfeld1,109 views
- 4:41Robert Reich on Governance, majority rule vs. l...by janhelfeld3,996 views
- 2:23Alan Colmes of Fox News on Forceby janhelfeld7,019 views
- 7:13Why did we Invade Iraq?- Nation Buildingby janhelfeld4,299 views
- 0:58Jan persuades George Will to accept a principleby janhelfeld7,829 views
- 8:41Should majority rule on everything? - Rep. Elio...by janhelfeld1,803 views
- 3:49Dr. Walter E.Wlliams on downsizingby janhelfeld3,527 views
- 2:13CIA Director on Principlesby janhelfeld2,079 views
- 8:03Does illegality equal immorality?by janhelfeld4,127 views
- 7:06Pelosi's Double Standard on the Minimum Wageby janhelfeld111,122 views
- 2:16LEGALIZING MARIJUANA - Rep. Carsonby janhelfeld3,824 views
- 4:45Charlie Rangel on Healthcareby janhelfeld12,225 views
- 4:34Congressman Clyburn on Racismby janhelfeld2,482 views
are you willing to debate anarchism vs. minarchism?
janhelfeld 2 years ago
jan, i heard your interview with anarchist stefbolt, you might want to re-think your own contradictions.
Victorprossartcom 2 years ago 2
WHAT CONTRADICTIONS? WILL YOU DEBATE? It is easy to win a debate if you don't give the other fellow equal time to defend his position and don't follow the rules you agreed to in the beginning of the debate.
janhelfeld 2 years ago
Stephan agreed to a particular format and he was unwilling to complete the debate as agreed to. We ran out of time because he exceeded the time allotted for answering questions, asked 13 questions instead of the 10 that he was allotted and had technical difficulties which were his responsibility.
janhelfeld 2 years ago
. I was generous and flexible and let him go over time assuming he would show me the same courtesy. However, he was unwilling to let me ask him even 10 questions much less 13. He was unwilling, to continue the debate with the rebuttals and summaries by both parties as agreed. Instead he preferred to produce a one-sided postmortem. If you are unwilling to respect the even most elemental principles of fairness you have to wonder what can be expected in a anarchist society.
janhelfeld 2 years ago
I am available to continue the debate with him or another anarchist. I challenged him to do so and I challenged other anarchist to do so but there were no takers. Do you know why? It is hard to win a debate when you are wrong. And sometimes, it takes a couple of rounds, but the truth ultimately becomes clear.
janhelfeld 2 years ago