Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Clinton Fired 92 Republican Attorneys

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
444 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 30, 2007

I'm so glad the Balanced Media is pointing this out... Yeah right!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (starmanres)

  • Clinton fired no Federal Prosecutors except for what is called "cause," once he named all 92 or so. One attorney actually bit somebody, so he was let go. Others were fired for not showing up, or doing bizarre things. There was no sense that his prosecutors were doing anything but enforcing the law as they knew it; they aren't there to do the president's bidding, but to enforce the law.

  • At no point has anyone stated they are there "to do the President's bidding" but as I have commented all along, they serve at the pleasure of the President and the Liberal Media's coverage of President Bush firing a dozen or so of them was "a huge miscarriage of justice" where as President Clinton firing 92 wasn't mentioned. Just one more blaring example of the obvious Bias in today's Mainstream Media.

  • Its pretty common to fire attorneys when a new president takes over. In fact that's happened with every new presidency. The difference was that Bush fired attorneys in the MIDDLE of his term, not the beginning, as common precedent, which the conservative media won't tell you.

  • I am amazed that many people do not understand what "serves at the pleasure of the President" means. It makes no difference if he removes them 1 second into his term or 1 second before it is up. The interesting part is that these attorneys were not following the President's views but the media painted it as something illegal when they were dismissed -- Clinton was not treated the same.

  • Starmanres - Do you really belief that? Do you really think these two issues are the same. Do you think that what Bush/Gonzo did was a proper use of White House discretion? I just want to better understand those that still have faith in this president. A majority of america does not feel as you do, and I just want to better understand that. Thank you.

  • The majority of America is spoon fed the biased agenda of the Liberal media. They attempt and often succeed to influence elections, wars and public perception through their "news". Most Americans have become sceptical of anything run by the media. It's no longer the truth but "written and produced".

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • But it doesn't matter. They serve at the pleasure of the President. Period. He could say he didn't like their hairstyles. There is no crime or cover up.

  • Everytime they talk about the 8 attorneys that were fired, they bring this up too. Point is, Clinton wasn't trying to hide why he fired his attorneys; whereas Bush is. At least Clinton's administration all had their story straight; Gonzalez's former aide testified to Charles Schumer(D)NY just 2 days ago that Gonzalez story is not what he is saying.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more