@psi2hi i have given u all u need. if u atack my spelling it means u lost the conversation. or dont whant to admit that its not a bug on the lens. read your PM. and leave me alone .and ill say again. light refraction , focal point. 3 demensional maths, and u will confirm its not a bug on the lens.
@dogsofwarclan Judging by your poor spelling, grammar and calculations you don't have the ability to prove anything. I am disappointed. It seems like you only have basic high school math.
Reageren op deze video... X , y and z. these things are used to get a fix of posstion within a 3dimensional space. and there called axis. are u really that stupid. ok lets make x the cam.. witch is 0.00 on the axis . and lets make the shadow Y. witch if u look at the building video and the peoiple walking about . 2.0 on the axis. this numeber alone will proof the ffing thing isnt on the cam . now u again insulting litle brat
@psi2hi im using a shadow as refrence point. cause thats not a object in the camera. this shadow is the only thing u need in the whole sum. to proof its not a bug on the lens. so in part 2 the sum
@dogsofwarclan I don't see you using any values for your calculations or even formulating an equation to prove anything. Hint: You may need to find out what kind of camera is being used in this video to determine the distance X (or whatever you are using as the camera axis.) You say you can prove it. So prove it.
@psi2hi ok ... X , y , and z axis ever used them . use these 3 axis and u can confirm its not a bug on the lens and i never said it was something different. and a bug on the lens would show more stuf like legs or atleast a recognizable feature of a bug on the lens.
wow!
i hope that teacher at the end doesn't teach anything important
al3699 4 months ago
Its not an insect it really is a shadow especially since it has human features and not bug features.
1234pokefan 8 months ago
You can tell by the way the shadow moves that it is an insect on the camera radome...
cwross1976 9 months ago
@psi2hi i have given u all u need. if u atack my spelling it means u lost the conversation. or dont whant to admit that its not a bug on the lens. read your PM. and leave me alone .and ill say again. light refraction , focal point. 3 demensional maths, and u will confirm its not a bug on the lens.
dogsofwarclan 1 year ago
@dogsofwarclan Judging by your poor spelling, grammar and calculations you don't have the ability to prove anything. I am disappointed. It seems like you only have basic high school math.
psi2hi 1 year ago
wow
713Jaime713 1 year ago
Reageren op deze video... X , y and z. these things are used to get a fix of posstion within a 3dimensional space. and there called axis. are u really that stupid. ok lets make x the cam.. witch is 0.00 on the axis . and lets make the shadow Y. witch if u look at the building video and the peoiple walking about . 2.0 on the axis. this numeber alone will proof the ffing thing isnt on the cam . now u again insulting litle brat
dogsofwarclan 1 year ago
@psi2hi im using a shadow as refrence point. cause thats not a object in the camera. this shadow is the only thing u need in the whole sum. to proof its not a bug on the lens. so in part 2 the sum
dogsofwarclan 1 year ago
@dogsofwarclan I don't see you using any values for your calculations or even formulating an equation to prove anything. Hint: You may need to find out what kind of camera is being used in this video to determine the distance X (or whatever you are using as the camera axis.) You say you can prove it. So prove it.
psi2hi 1 year ago
@psi2hi ok ... X , y , and z axis ever used them . use these 3 axis and u can confirm its not a bug on the lens and i never said it was something different. and a bug on the lens would show more stuf like legs or atleast a recognizable feature of a bug on the lens.
dogsofwarclan 1 year ago