KQED Spark - Anna Maltz
Loading...
297,423
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (157)
-
whyyyyyyyyyy
-
Ouch. Blurring outfit? That's so stupid :>
-
تتتتتتتتتتتت
-
this is fucked up man who dresses their child ,like that, im pretty sure my mom didnt dress me like that and take pictures of me
-
now thats art
-
uhhh why did she put it on her kid this is wierd wtf
-
$2,453,732.26 in tax money was spent by the National Endowment for the Arts to produce this work of "art."
-
Three words: what the fuck?
-
no
-
Lol! They look comfortable...but why even bother wearing clothes if they are pretending to be nakid~!
Loading...
why does furry "material" have to be blurred out? especially if children are wearing it? whose sinless souls are we protecting/ little old ladies?
djmarkcotter 2 years ago 30
No. If you were a child that age, I don't think you would care all that much. They seem to be having a good time
Young children don't care about nudity until we tell them that being nude is evil.
ninjamatic5000 2 years ago 25