Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Mission To Mars

The trailer.  
 
Customize

More From: siusiumak

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
78 ratings
Sign in to rate
76,243 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (137)   Options

Loading...
Grant691 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You'd have to see the movie. The reason he takes off his helmet is because his cord broke of the spacecraft and his wife(another astronaut) went after him. He didn't want her to die trying to save him so he depressurised
toralisasam (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The only feasible way of getting to mars is to use some sort of shuttle- vertical take off and landing isnt an option as a few guys have pointed out.
But even then, a shuttle needs a HUGE runway to land on... and im not sure mars has many of those.
So nope, i don't reckon we'll see a landing on Mars in this century, let alone by 2020 or whenever they were saying they'd do it.
toralisasam (3 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
BUT on the subject of this movie- it's actually quite good as a time waster, you just have to ignore the mistakes and treat it as a B-movie lol.
Helge129 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Lol, Mars's got an etremely thin atmosphere, and just half the gravity of earth: It is relatively easy to get off that red rock, vertically.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
carloscavalcanti (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So, I´d like to discuss some aspects of the ship that will take humankind there.

First, it has to be re-entry capable. It has to be able to land AND take off vertically.

It could only land vertically, and take off on a runway, built by those who get there. But it seems too risky and far-fetched to me. What if for some reason they can´t built it? The machinery and materials... no, it won´t happen. It has to land and take off vertically.
carloscavalcanti (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Those scenes are totally flawed, on the physics aspect. Even a high-school kid can tell.
carloscavalcanti (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Seconded. Plus, it has a lot of flaws even a high-school physics student can notice.

They say NASA helped them. I wonder if they didnt. Spacecrafts made of wood, maybe...
darmokandgalad (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yeah NASA is filled with really smart people, I have trouble believing they would be dumb enough to attach themselves to this train wreck.

I am being really serious when I say that this whole movie is just completely stolen from 2001, but made 100x dumber.
carloscavalcanti (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Do you know what I hate the most? The artist´s conceptions and the dumb plans to go to mars.

All of the artists conceptions are exactly the same, or almost the same: a big rocket, a big habitat. It´s like the old conceptions of going to the moon.

Why aren´t we in Mars yet? One simple answer: because we don´t have the spaceship do go there.

You can´t use the "missile" approach here. You can´t put some guys in a capsule on top of a rocket, lauch them, then re-entry them.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.