Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
You'd have to see the movie. The reason he takes off his helmet is because his cord broke of the spacecraft and his wife(another astronaut) went after him. He didn't want her to die trying to save him so he depressurised
The only feasible way of getting to mars is to use some sort of shuttle- vertical take off and landing isnt an option as a few guys have pointed out. But even then, a shuttle needs a HUGE runway to land on... and im not sure mars has many of those. So nope, i don't reckon we'll see a landing on Mars in this century, let alone by 2020 or whenever they were saying they'd do it.
The moon missions were faked. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". On page 15 there's a partial summary of hoax evidence. It's the seventh post from the top.
After the Apollo hoax, we have to wonder about everything else too.
So, I´d like to discuss some aspects of the ship that will take humankind there.
First, it has to be re-entry capable. It has to be able to land AND take off vertically.
It could only land vertically, and take off on a runway, built by those who get there. But it seems too risky and far-fetched to me. What if for some reason they can´t built it? The machinery and materials... no, it won´t happen. It has to land and take off vertically.
Do you know what I hate the most? The artist´s conceptions and the dumb plans to go to mars.
All of the artists conceptions are exactly the same, or almost the same: a big rocket, a big habitat. It´s like the old conceptions of going to the moon.
Why aren´t we in Mars yet? One simple answer: because we don´t have the spaceship do go there.
You can´t use the "missile" approach here. You can´t put some guys in a capsule on top of a rocket, lauch them, then re-entry them.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
But even then, a shuttle needs a HUGE runway to land on... and im not sure mars has many of those.
So nope, i don't reckon we'll see a landing on Mars in this century, let alone by 2020 or whenever they were saying they'd do it.
The moon missions were faked. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". On page 15 there's a partial summary of hoax evidence. It's the seventh post from the top.
After the Apollo hoax, we have to wonder about everything else too.
Do a YouTube search on "MarsFaker".
First, it has to be re-entry capable. It has to be able to land AND take off vertically.
It could only land vertically, and take off on a runway, built by those who get there. But it seems too risky and far-fetched to me. What if for some reason they can´t built it? The machinery and materials... no, it won´t happen. It has to land and take off vertically.
They say NASA helped them. I wonder if they didnt. Spacecrafts made of wood, maybe...
I am being really serious when I say that this whole movie is just completely stolen from 2001, but made 100x dumber.
All of the artists conceptions are exactly the same, or almost the same: a big rocket, a big habitat. It´s like the old conceptions of going to the moon.
Why aren´t we in Mars yet? One simple answer: because we don´t have the spaceship do go there.
You can´t use the "missile" approach here. You can´t put some guys in a capsule on top of a rocket, lauch them, then re-entry them.