Christian Censorship Vs jezuzfreek777
Top Comments
All Comments (728)
-
What I said about respect for jezuzfreek?
Yeah, never mind.
-
the irony...it tastes.......delicious
-
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weeb
ly.com announcements-balancedway.yola
site.com -
The greatest human trait is that to ignore.
-
Youtube should be all about sharing videos and having the community comment on them. I do not believe that comments should be allowed to be disabled. If there are spam comments, they can be edited out, or maybe the username blocked, but having a healthy discussion should be permitted on all videos, especially those pertaining to religious views and similar.
-
Well done, Thunderf00t, as always, putting the intellectually inferior into their proper place.
-
Beautiful Les Paul in reflection on the 'screeny'
-
Yay for double standards? What an idiot.
-
True all the way.
-
Censoring should only be allowed if the comments are spam. But if the comments are an argument against a person's belief, then that person should have the balls and argue back. Don't hide behind censorship and think the debate will go away. People who do that look weak.
Does jezuzfreek777 drink gasoline in his spare time? He has the reasoning of a kid that closes his eyes to hide.
TAz69x 2 years ago 71
Hypocristianity
akumaten 2 years ago 17