Obama smackdown of state abortion laws

www.colony14.net Campaign ad criticizing Obama's support of unrestricted abortions and his disregard for the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• political
• commercial
• Obama
• abortion
• state
• laws
• Sixth
• Commandment
• 10th
• Amendment

[lorajodavis]

Hmm, I wonder what happened to that legislation that Obama was supposed to be signing? Surely the Republican candidate would not lie about such an important issue.

Thank heavens, only the states with high divorce rates,higher than average child abuse, lower educational achievement. higher prison populations, and more mental illness were the only states that did believe this obvious lie.

[colony14]

It is a fact that Obama promised he would sign such a law. That Congress never passed it and sent it to him for his signature means nothing. His pro-abortion record in he Illinois State Senate proves he has no respect for human life.

Of course, Obama lied and promised a lot of people he would sign a lot of laws. He promised illegal immigrant students he would sign the DREAM Act to give them amnesty, and he has not done that - because the bill has not passed in Congress.

[PALOMITA694]

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IS JUSTICE FOR ALL!

BY THE WAY, SOME GODS HAVE ORDER PEOPLE TO KILL.

[lorajodavis]

What happened to that law they said Obama was going to sign?

Thank heavens, only the mentally challenged believed this horse manure.

[youneac]

@colony14 I fail to see your point. Your vid falsely claims that Obama intends to legalize third trimester abortions, but this last argument of yours just suggests a failure of the judicial system to prevent illegal abortions.

Only 0.01% of abortions in the US are performed in the third trimester. (source: Abortion Statistics, Fox News). To me this seems like a low enough number to suggest real medical necessity. If you have evidence to the contrary, I'd like to hear it.

[colony14]

You are missing the point, which is that the mother's life is ALMOST NEVER in danger... but the rules are abused to perform abortions on thousands of women in their late stages of pregnancy. I am not opposed to abortion in those RARE cases where it in fact it does save the mother's life. I am opposed to people gaming the system and abortionists lying about risks to the mother in order to "justify" the abortion.

If you cannot understand those differences, you can understand little.

[youneac]

@colony14 Yeah, so then it's better to have legislation that kills both mother and child than legislation that may be abused, right?! Following that logic, we might as well legally declare everyone a rapist, because surely some people will commit rape even though it is illegal.

[youneac]

@colony14 So there is not one single occasion where Obama challenged the Planned Parenthood vs. Casey ruling? Then I think we're done here.

[colony14]

The abortionists readily get around that by always arguing that the mother's life is in danger - which is almost never the case.

[colony14]

In the Illinois State Senate Obama opposed a bill that defined as a person a fully born baby who survives an abortion. Obama argued that defining a pre-viable fetus that survives an abortion as a person or child would essentially bar abortions, because the Equal Protection Clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute. (Obama thus argued, We cant call it a person because then we cant kill it.)