This is the back of an HP c7000 Blade Chassis. Imagine the complexity and cost of adding a new HP chassis vs the simplicity and lower cost of adding a new Cisco chassis. And I haven't even showed you the cool management, this is just from the hardware perspective. Compare this to my other videos showing the back of Cisco UCS
I think the point the varrowinc is trying to make is that when you go to scale out with UCS you don't have anywhere near as many cables and adapters to deal with. Especially when you make use of UCS M81KR Virtual Interface Card, which can function as both FC or 10GE on the same card. This really does reduce the cost and complexity of scaling out. Ive worked in many server rooms... and I can tell I sure wish i was dealing with something similar to UCS back in those days.
JamesUCS 1 year ago
It's not like configuring and maintaining a HP Bladechassis is rocket science. And how am I supposed to know how "complex" it is to add another one, just by looking at a 29 second shaky YouTube video?
Obvious troll is obvious.
aschepersgmailcom 1 year ago
WTF? hahahaha, That are not Gigabit or Fibre Channel Blades! xDDD. those are Ggabit or Fibre Channel Modules for the Front Blade Servers in the blade System HP, those can not be compared with a Cisco UCS.
You can compare The whole servers system with the Cisco UCS, but not the modules xD the modules for itselves are completley useless.
Even like that, Cisco and IBM solutions Rocks and HP solutios sucks pretty bad.
xpeed1 2 years ago