Goldberg vs Scott Putski 7.9. 1998 (141-0)
Top Comments
All Comments (24)
-
@bearone7777 : absolutely Friend..pure hard wash junk..cause after ruining Mr. Goldberg's winning streak that (WCW) company went dwn the tubes..it was just a matter of time!..hope that the WWE will have the decency to produce The Best of GOLDBERG & a Mattel action figure to go along w/ it!..cheers! ;o)
-
@tornmask THXS MASK. I MEAN THIS IS FROM ME A GUY THAT HAS WATCHED THIS STUFF FOR OVER 50+YRS. THIS WAS ABOUT THE ONLY TIME IN IT'S HISTORY THAT REALLY MEANT SOMETHING TO THE CROWDS THAT CAME TO WATCH IT---WHY?? BILL GOLDBERG THAT IS WHY. NO-ONE COULD TOUCH HIM, AND THAT WAS FINE IN THE FANS BOOK. THEY LOVED HIM, BUT FOR BILL GOLDBERG TO HAVE TO LOST TO KEVIN NASH THAT WAS PLAIN, AND SIMPLE BULL-SHIT ALL THE WAY.
-
@bearone7777 : thx, i 2nd that statment! =0]
-
@michaelmorr11 of course its fake, the idea was to build goldberg as a force to put people in seats. Even he says that it was a farce, goldbers was about getting into movies and acting, not being a pro wrestler.
-
@tornmask Best time to actually watch what was then really more like "PRO-WRESTLING". Great comment here.
-
Rope 1
Goldberg 0
-
THIS WAS GOOD STUFF DURING THAT TIME! =0I
-
yup, but I think most people know what. I remember him being something like 63-0 and wondering when the hell he wrestled 63 times. lol
-
lol that rope at 2:06 did more damage to goldberg than his opponents.
-
i think Scott Putski is better then other polish guy Shawn Stasiak
LOL, he fell at 2:06. kicked his ass doe
SippiCupp 3 years ago 13
goldberg man hes a fuckin tank
q8shiaprince 2 years ago 7