Ian Juby and geology....
Uploader Comments (orge121)
Video Responses
All Comments (30)
-
@Equestions This video is not meant to be a comprehensive discussion of structural geology, rather I simply wanted to show examples of "overthrusting". This does not baffle geologists, rather it is well understood. It can be verified with a geologic survey (which produce geologic maps 2:34) and various geophysical techniques such as a seismic survey (1:21). I do a lot of ad hom attacks...but hey its YT.
-
@Equestions Thrusting and folding are commonly understood geologic mechanisms. It is well understood because you can see it on a grand scale and a small scale by doing a geologic survey. The barrage of photos during the video showcase how folding and thrusting can create a "reversal of the geologic column". My personal favorite part is at 2:00 when I show slickensides at the valley of fire as he is saying they dont exist.
-
@orge refute ANYTHING he said right? Do you not get that? Maybe you did that in another vid and I haven't seen it yet where you go into detail about where Ian is wrong with actual examples and papers and such? Saying things like "Where are his actual geologic maps?" doesn't actually refute what he's saying as incorrect. I kinda thought you had a grasp on geology but maybe I was wrong? You say your a geophysicist but I haven't seen any evidence for that yet orge. I'll watch Claire's vid too.
-
(1) Ummm....OK. So I watched this vid as you requested orge and at NO time did you actually refute what Ian claims in his video. All you basically said was a bunch of "he doesn't know what he's talking about" and "He needs to read the indoctrination papers I've read" and "I think he's dumb". Soooo...at what point do you actually offer real evidence to counter what he said? You do realize all you did was make ad hom attacks the entire vid right? You do realize this right? You didn't actually
-
@orge121 I'm disappointed in you too :) One thing atheevos never seem to recognize is that snarky commentary in place of actual SCIENTIFIC REFUTATION does not sway those of us who originally came at the various issues of origins & creation v evolution objectively. We need for you to actually roll up your sleeves and get down to the business of helping us understand WHY Juby is wrong. Telling us he doesn't understand and that a book sucks just sounds like the sour grapes of the defeated.
-
the stupid...it burns.
-
ian lives about 1/2 hour away from where i live, hes a nice guy socially, but his theories are kinda wacked out.
-
"If you look up the physical process... you would understand it" you say - I don't think he would. People like him would cling to any hay straw that would support their twisted view of how Earth was made, and would discard hard evidence for the opposite as fraud.
-
Wow, Jubly's stupid is like spike being driven into my brain. Because he sees a rock formation that goes against his "failed out of kindergarten" understanding of geology, that disproves all of established geology and evolution? RIIIIIIIGHT!!!!!!!
-
@lawilson200 Wunderbar. Thanks!
Isn't his last name "Juby"?
KaroKoenich 4 months ago
@KaroKoenich Hey whoa...look at that brand new title!!!
orge121 4 months ago
@KaroKoenich Actually..quite a few typos in this one...im a rather disappointed in my self...
orge121 4 months ago