Goodness Without God is Good Enough: William Lane Craig vs Paul Kurtz 5/7

A debate between renowned Christian apologist and philosopher William Lane Craig and prominent humanist philosopher Paul Kurtz at Franklin & Marshall College discussing whether God is necessary for a sound foundation for morality.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• William
• Lane
• Craig
• Paul
• Kurtz
• Morality
• God
• Theism
• Atheism
• Humanism
• Nihilism
• Goodness

[jefersontorres]

4:45 - We are human beins and we love one another ?! Hahahaha... read same Freud (Civilization and its discontents).

[6thwing]

What kind of messed up mics do they have there? I noticed it in the last video too.

[efeey]

@zirchsoft ok buddy

[zirchsoft]

@efeey

as unintelligent as what you have just asked

[efeey]

kurtz is really unintelligent in this debate i feel. he doesnt understand the debate question. who can beat craig?

[HonestTechnoAtheist]

What is that horrible humming noise?

[Jugglable]

@sirany900 I'm not attributing it to god.

[sirany900]

@Jugglable , why do have to attribute the 9/11 event to God? Did God cause the 9/11 attack? This sad event should remind of inhumanity of man to one another.

[HerrVonManstein]

@awesomewelles90 haha you're the idiot here. Kurtz made some very good points and it's that little maggot crawling at the feet of his god who didn't understand that if without god HE will become a nihilist, it doesn't mean this is true of atheist. theists are a buch of cowardly slaves who have never grown up and have never learned to live without their Father

[BloodOfRayne]

Don't worry about it. Some atheists' apparently haven't "evolved" a sense of humor. They always go on about "free speech" and then spam anything they don't like the sound of. Always makes me laugh. ; )