Obama has voted time and time again FOR Partial Birth Abortions.
Since it was first coined in 1995 by pro-life congressman Charles T. Canady, the term "partial birth abortion" has been used in numerous state and federal bills and laws, although the legal definition of the term is not always the same. In the 2000 Supreme Court case of Stenberg v. Carhart, a Nebraska law banning "partial-birth abortion" was ruled unconstitutional, in part because the language defining "partial-birth abortion" was deemed vague. In 2006, the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. Carhart found that the 2003 act "departs in material ways" from the Nebraska law and that it pertains only to a specific abortion procedure, intact dilation and extraction. Some commentators have noted that the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act's language was carefully crafted to take into account previous rulings. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act defines "partial-birth abortion" as follows:
An abortion in which the person performing the abortion, deliberately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living fetus until, in the case of a head-first presentation, the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother, or, in the case of breech presentation, any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother, for the purpose of performing an overt act that the person knows will kill the partially delivered living fetus; and performs the overt act, other than completion of delivery, that kills the partially delivered living fetus. (18 U.S. Code 1531)
Although in most cases the procedure legally defined as "partial birth abortion" would be medically defined as "intact dilation and extraction", these overlapping terms do not always coincide. For example, the IDX procedure may be used to remove a deceased fetus (e.g. due to a miscarriage or feticide) that is developed enough to require dilation of the cervix for its extraction. Removing a dead fetus does not meet the federal legal definition of "partial-birth abortion," which specifies that partial live delivery must precede "the overt act, other than completion of delivery, that kills the partially delivered living fetus."
Additionally, a doctor may extract a fetus past the navel and then "disarticulate at the neck", which could fall within the terms of the statute even though it would not result in an intact body and therefore would not be an intact dilation and extraction.
yay obama
robloxpwnmaster3 2 weeks ago
What they fail to mention here is this is never done to save a Women's life..It indangers a Womens life as they are sent to a hotel day after day with a balloon like cathater to enlarge the cervix and force it open to be able to turn the baby and then kill the baby..If a womens life is ever in danger a C- Section is done and doctors work to save both Mother and Child!!!
ronpaulfreedom1 1 month ago in playlist OBAMA EVIL
CRYING
TheTamtam76 2 months ago in playlist OBAMA EVIL
im going to go hold my one year old beautiful daughter. as soon as i stop cring. DADDY LOVES YOU LITTLE PRINCESS!
TheTamtam76 2 months ago in playlist OBAMA EVIL
get him out the white house!
julezindahouse 3 months ago in playlist Liked
stupid video. anyone that agrees with this idiocy is a moron.
neoconsnightmare3 4 months ago
I say we abort the moms and let the babies live....
Lboogie501 5 months ago
this is disgusting, use a fuckin condom!
ChAinEdHeArt88 6 months ago
Im always suprised that the whole pro-life debate is talked about in terms of politics and or religion.Im a fairly liberal athiest but I can see that this is wrong.Im not sure what situations this procedure would be used in.If the mother was going to lose her life then it may be understandable.
170adamb 6 months ago
Pro choice all the fucking way.
5shredster5 6 months ago