WTC No Plane Truth (Part 4)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
18,356
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 26, 2008

Plane or missile? This clip is from "September Clues" from mastermind Simonshack.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 19 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (muzicmaker2001)

  • The Government is smart enough to pull off, the biggest conspiracy in the world to date, but forgot to put the background in on a video. hahahahahahaha my god, please, tell me your joking.

  • @86Blessed86

    And the government was not smart enough to pull off this.That is the whole point..and why experts from many different fields of study have banded together against this fairy tale.

  • 1:18, the background has been cleared up, in the first live picture, the plane is nearly the same colour as the background. The news clears up video's all the time, to see what the naked eye can't, just a little bit of info for you, a good enough camera lense can actually pick up what the naked eye can't see. obviouse.

  • @86Blessed86

    I don't know where to start...Let me get this right. You think on the clear sunny morning of sept 11 with the high quality news cameras, your vision was so blurred or not capabe of seeing the immense background of NYC? Were they using cameras from Kmart? That's the funniest one I've heard so far. Thanx for that...

  • @muzicmaker2001 You are not the smartest person are you, a thousand camera's caught the planes flying, from 1000 different angles, "The video we are talking about is the one above brainiac" and i am saying that the camera in the video you are showing does not have a clear shot because it is so far away, and the most rediculas comment i have ever heard was you saying,"if the plane was polverized before entry then why didn't it drop to the ground in a fire ball: oh my god.

  • @86Blessed86

    You are talking about this clip? Really? I had no idea. The perspectives, angles, height of the camera view of both clips are near identical. That is obvious. So, pulverized aluminum should enter a steel building? Please do yourself a favor and look up other plane vs; buildings crashes. You can start with the B-25 bomber vs. the Empire State building. The engines entered and the rest of the plane (yes, wait for it) rained down onto the streets.

  • @86Blessed86

    Here's some more education for ya. Another plane vs. building. See the pile of burning plane wreckage on the lawn OUTSIDE the building? What do you think that means?

    watch?v=9ZKf0s4aqkU

see all

All Comments (353)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "WTC 7 theory"

  • @muzicmaker2001 also, how close do you think the police helicopters would let the news camera helicopters get?? not very close, so no, thank you for making me laugh. I've smashed your elevator theory on the head and if you want to debate about that i'll smash you out of the park with it, you ruin the 9/11 truth movements hard work on the smoking gun of 9/11, the "WTC & "thermitic" theories because OS believers see this bullshit and think you are all like this, just flat out dumb.

  • The EVENING NEWS is also zoomed in 2x. and another fact, The Evening News has cleared the background so much, that you can't even see the land behind the buildings which you can clearly see on the Live feed, is the land mass behind the towers fake aswell????

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more