Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

39: Equality - Conclusion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,066
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 15, 2010

Looks at the impossibility of achieving equality as defined by Feminists. Equality of outcome is a logical impossibility when dealing with men and women. Suggests that the concept of "sexism" needs to be revisited. Men and women are different and we need to address these differences fairly rather than pretending that they don't exist.

• Massive discrimination against men in the pursuit of equality
• How many girls grow up dreaming of becoming astronauts?
• Government's unrealistic approach to equality
• The rise of women in the workplace
• Is "diversity" overrated?
• Sexism is appropriate more often than not
• A permanent gender war

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (manwomanmyth)

  • I watched this with the hope that it would be useful in presenting a case to those who I find do not agree with me that there is an unbelievable amount of sexism against men that is ignored. However, I am tragically frustrated by this video. The bit about putting a 12-year-old disabled girl on the men's olympic team was atrocious. These claims are without proper background and I was extremely disappointed with the case made by this video.

  • @ObscureAcronymsMedia I think it was Ricky nelson that sung: "You can't please everyone, and so you've got to please yourself".

    I am happy with the content and delivery of this film (and the others in the series) and I accomplished my objectives in covering the issue of equality.

  • Great post. I like the toxic female one too. Your vids here hold me back from leaning more towards equality, even though I don't think the traditional ways will ever come back again, which is opposite of what you guys seem to be saying here, that equality will never work. That's what I meant in the other vid we were talking in. I don't see them all going back to being housewives, they're too entrenched in the economy now. So in my opinion, "equality" is the only choice we have left.

  • @bweazel But, as this video explores: what does "equality" mean?

    "Traditional" ways are nothing to do with anything. You have repeatedly commented about the films promoting a "return" to "traditional" ways of doing things. Not true. This is a poor understanding of the material.

    What IS said is that the sexes are different, are complimentary and should not be adversarial, have different abilities and make different choices. From this, we should let the cards fall where they may i.e. MERITOCRACY.

  • Equality of outcome is not possible, and I think most people know this. All that a rational person really wants is equality of opportunity and treatment, which is all we can really ask for. It is sad that the feminists didn't get the memo. When someone is handed something that they didn't work for, it cheapens those of us that actually DID work for it.

  • @LadyRuin2012 Of course equality outcome is not possible and of course most people know this. But try telling this to our Feminist-run government.

    Equality of opportunity is already here and has been for a long time, for men and women. However, the laws discriminating against men continue to be passed; businesses continue to be pressured with female quota's; female students are still receiving hugely more help in education despite outnumbering men and boys at all stages, especially university.

Top Comments

  • @manwomanmyth

    A 'feminist-apologist'?

    I'm offended.

    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    What I said is entirely accurate: many rail against 'equality of outcomes' as though feminists were actually seeking 'equality of outcomes', and that's a waste of time.

    Feminists seek legislated inequality based on a tribal pursuit of unearned advantages.

    That is worth addressing.

  • @manwomanmyth

    A 'feminist-apologist'?

    I'm offended.

    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    What I said is entirely accurate: many rail against 'equality of outcomes' as though feminists were actually seeking 'equality of outcomes', and that's a waste of time.

    Feminists seek legislated inequality based on a tribal pursuit of unearned advantages.

    That is worth addressing.

see all

All Comments (115)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1:45 "There is no solution"

    Wrong. The man just have to work less. I don't see why anyone should have to work more just because he has a penis. In this hypothetical working environment, i know i would. Screw them.

  • is part of the reason male dominated jobs like construction or street work considered "Bad" (as in like lowlife work) is because the feminists have pushed their values onto society and made everyone think only "women's" jobs are the most worthwhile? Despite the fact that those kind of jobs that men do are necessary for society to function?

  • i work in a female dominated industry. i know I am better at my job than most but get an average wage. Women get to change their hours, job titles and pay with a quick chat with HR and the click of the fingers on a computer. If I want a change to my hours, job title or pay there has to be a referendum of ALL the women in the company. It's bull@#%#

  • Men are willing to take more risks and work in hazardous situations, of course some women are willing too but those numbers are small.

  • @ObscureAcronymsMedia This video made an excellent case. You are in denial.

  • @MikeTMerciless our society is sexist.They only support feminism.But women tend to forget that they are naturally weaker to men.It's what god has made in every being.Even in a Lion,The male is more dominant than the female.But unfortunately some women suffering from inferiority complex want to be higher than men.I thought feminism was equality,it was not supposed to be the argument that Women are superior to men.Modern Feminism is becoming evil.They are becoming a hate group like KKK.

  • @snafoofoo "If pilots can't handle the intense maneuver, they're at major risk during flights that encounter high G-force, Hearon said. Women traditionally had more trouble with the maneuver than men.

    Hearon and colleagues outfitted women with newly designed anti-G suits to see if that helped. It did, and the women surprised the researchers by performing as well as the men."

    (surprised, ahem)

    And women do get better pay than men in some jobs, look up Warren Farrell's work.

  • @snafoofoo "Results showed that G-tolerance with fit G-suits is the same compared to male fighter pilots. However, female flight performance was 15% lower than male fighter pilot performance in equal conditions. Conclusion is that female fighter pilots have to push much harder in high G environment and this effort will decrease their ability to make correct tactical maneuvers in order to get clear gun or missile shot"

    Female Military Pilots in Finnish Air Force

    Tuomo Leino, M.D.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more