WTC vs Boeing
Loading...
Loading...
1,105
Loading...
Uploaded by guntherznadz on May 24, 2007
It's not hard to understand that planes didn't hit the towers. Planes can't fly through buildings, it's impossible.If you think they can, thats only because you think they did..........they didn't
1:13
911 WTC Stealth fast morphing fake birds super boeingby nanoprobe739,767 views- 1:07
Boeing 40C TV Videoby alcessnapilot1,027 views
- 2:29
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center "Plane Missiles" Explainedby RKOwens4443,356 views
- 0:26
Plane that struck the World Trade Center was not a boeing 767by vinayakaya1,025,807 views
- 5:27
9/11 NOplanes by "guntherznadz"!by Farshad1975950 views
- 3:05
Plane Hits New York City Building, Live! October 11, 2006by cesardominguez369,976 views
- 0:48
Boeing Propagandaby powmadeak473,321 views
- 6:27
WTC 1 Projectile Motionby lnielsen7614,176 views
- 1:29
The biggest airplanes everby pureboeing15,415 views
- 1:13
September 11th REAL BOEING Flys over NYC 4-2009 Air Force one WTC PROOFby tonydayna23,498 views
- 6:18
Pilots for 9/11 Truth: Airplane controllabilityby CTV91110,415 views
- 0:58
PILOT SAYS "NO WAY" TO 9/11 FAIRYTALEby crabtrap8,319 views
- 9:49
WTC 7 Loose Change Final Cutby WTC7WasPulled32,154 views
- 3:38
WTC VS DEMOLIZIONE CONTROLLATAby schottolo42,078 views
- 9:11
Justice For 9/11 (2/2)by NufffRespect73,134 views
- 2:13
Reverse Speech - Bush admits 9/11 is "in a larger deal"?by Jamiep84314,552 views
- 10:00
September Clues - Part 3by keyhole91152,006 views
- 3:36
Ground Zero ironworkers on 9/11 anomaliesby total411info72,598 views
- 3:00
Renault crash test vs 911planesby muckletoon13,129 views
- 1:38
no impactby muckletoon503,659 views
We need a new 911 investigation; on that we can all agree.
ronheri 3 years ago
haha bullshit. If it wasn't a plane, then what was it? A UFO possibly? Hahah
codi79 3 years ago
Well, we agree on something. :)
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
"diversionary pathetic pettiness". what are you on?, what confirmation?.. you make no sense. I was just pointing out evidence was removed and destroyed from a crime scene, do you not think this is right? when you see something that is clearly wrong should we not point it out?, if there has been an injustice don't we owe it to the victims, to speak up and give them a voice?.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
For your information, Wtc complex was not treated as a crime scene as it should have been, as a lot of the evidence was quickly removed, shipped abroad or destroyed, like the steel, so full scale forensic tests could not be done to gage the exact temperatures reached in critical locations by steel analysis, that could have proved or disproved foul play, why?
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
Forensics?.. what the hell you on about, it is very easy to tell that the planes are fake, so it's pointless arguing that they are not. That is why I asked what problems you would encounter and why, if you had to fake these plane images. If you at least try to answer my question you'll see for yourself why the planes are fake.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
What I am saying is it's a pointless argument because it is provable by analyzing the footage. Yet you are arguing that the planes are real, so why talk about video analysis if by your own admission you have no clue?.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
SlackerSlayer, Why cant you answer my question? I thought you were an authority on video manipulation, or that's what you tried to make out, the reason I asked you is anyone who knew anything about the problems of superimposing fake plane images into near real-time footage would understand how to tell they are fake.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
Well you tell me Mr know it all, if you had to put fake plane images into delayed "live feed", what problems would you encounter and why?..
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
Yeah I've never understood how anti-planners could not explain how the personal footage was faked...Or how anything else was faked for that matter.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago