Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Beatles - I wanna be your man

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
188,115
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 1, 2007

Rolling stone then Beatles

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The Beatles version is FAR superior

  • I like both versions. But sorta The Beatles are better, no offense Rolling Stones fans.

    Well I like both versions...

see all

All Comments (239)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @AmonCOCO omg! it's true i never noticed!!

  • QUICHE

  • lol, the beatles legs are SO LONG. especially paul. 

  • I saw both The Stones and The Beatles live. Couldn't hear much because of the all screaming. I was one of the odd ones who wanted to listen but felt compelled to join in with the screamers [how stupid was that!]. Anyway, both versions are good on vinyl but I have to say that this was not the Stones at their best on the day that this recording was made. It is a myth that all Beatles fans disliked the Stones at the time.

  • 42 people need a man.

  • Omg rolling stones version is awful D': cant beat the original

  • @netboy04 Liverpool is 250 miles away from London mate. I'm from Liverpool and its nowhere near as bad as what people say it is. Compared to some of the Cities surrounding it its pretty soft. Birmingham and Manchester suffer higher crime-rates. Its blown out of all proportion. However, I wasn't alive in the 50's when they grew up and since Liverpool was the second most bombed place in the country so it may have been worse then. There are still bad places here but I find Woolton rather pleasant.

  • @netboy04 Liverpool is 250 miles away from London mate. I'm from Liverpool and its nowhere near as bad as what people say it is. Compared to some of the Cities surrounding it its pretty soft. Birmingham and Manchester suffer higher crime-rates. Its blown out of all proportion. However, I wasn't alive in the 50's when they grew up and since Liverpool was the second most bombed place in the country so it may have been worse then. There are still bad places here but I find Woolton rather pleasant.

  • There is a perception that the Stones were the bad boys and the Beatles were the clean cut ones. Fact of the matter is, all of the members of the Stones were from the suburbs and the country side and the Beatles grew up in arguably the toughest neighborhood in all of London. Liverpool was a nasty place.

  • Ringo. You boss. You are too amazing.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more