Why the hell would we be interested in "taking control of Russia". For one, Obama has shelved the idea missiles idea (NATO) if you bothered to keep up. We're too preoccupied with a war people in the US don't even want. The US was just attacked by terrorists not too long ago. Of COURSE we're going to keep at least a few missiles in anti-terrorist camps to protect ourselves. They're not for Russia, but for terrorists. The US doesn't revolve around Russia.
The US is in serious debt and the war in Iraq for oil that we're currently in right now is very unpopular even among the American citizens. I seriously doubt that adding another war to our list of debts would happen any time now especially for world domination. Why the fuck would we want that anyway? Get you head out of your ass and actually use your head. As for "taking control of these resources, we BUY oil from other countries thus making them richer if that's what you mean.
@jadeyes914 Are you saying that providing military with over 600 billion dollars annually, you can't dominate everything? Everything they say about healthcare and economy is shit. In reality your economy is based on natural resources found in other countries. Your country takes control of these resources either through peace or through military confrontation. 47 out of 51 richest corporations in world are established in U.S. We can make some really interesting conclusions on this.
@jadeyes914 No man...I am not addicted to the past. I am addicted to present and the closest future. What kind of partnership are you talking about, when NATO is gradually expanding towards Russia, in order to make it easier to invade the Russian soil in any case? U.S. have paralyzed and sanctioned Russia in almost every economic and military parameter. Pentagon and Halliburton don't need partnership. They need money and totalitarian control over every economy in this world.
oh, stop living in the past. it's not going to get us anywhere. we need to keep moving forward. if we kept old grudges then we'd all be enemies and the world would go to hell.
wrong! we don't have the money to "dominate" anything. right now, we're more focused on our economy and, most importantly, healthcare. that's all i hear about now these days which is starting to annoy
HAHA EVERY US PRESIDEMTIAL CANDITATE went to AIPEC FOR APROVAL Hilary promisedsheWILL bomb iran F the allowed her to beccome president WHY DO americans vote for? see on you tube the computer programmer who stated on OATH about the programme he was comisions to creat foe rigging the elections federal reserve IMF world bank all owned by private bankers all screwing up america to slavery te also own u r news media u r government have HUGE influences in the CIA aks who runs u r tel. exchange
"The American invasion of Vietnam" WTF?!?
Hairysteed 1 year ago
usa dosent even care about russia we care about our alliance with china and our allies
DuMb2Qu1cK 1 year ago
@vendetta007mike rewatch 4:13 - 4:17
jadeyes914 1 year ago
@vendetta007mike
Why the hell would we be interested in "taking control of Russia". For one, Obama has shelved the idea missiles idea (NATO) if you bothered to keep up. We're too preoccupied with a war people in the US don't even want. The US was just attacked by terrorists not too long ago. Of COURSE we're going to keep at least a few missiles in anti-terrorist camps to protect ourselves. They're not for Russia, but for terrorists. The US doesn't revolve around Russia.
jadeyes914 1 year ago
@vendetta007mike
The US is in serious debt and the war in Iraq for oil that we're currently in right now is very unpopular even among the American citizens. I seriously doubt that adding another war to our list of debts would happen any time now especially for world domination. Why the fuck would we want that anyway? Get you head out of your ass and actually use your head. As for "taking control of these resources, we BUY oil from other countries thus making them richer if that's what you mean.
jadeyes914 1 year ago
@jadeyes914 Are you saying that providing military with over 600 billion dollars annually, you can't dominate everything? Everything they say about healthcare and economy is shit. In reality your economy is based on natural resources found in other countries. Your country takes control of these resources either through peace or through military confrontation. 47 out of 51 richest corporations in world are established in U.S. We can make some really interesting conclusions on this.
vendetta007mike 1 year ago
@jadeyes914 No man...I am not addicted to the past. I am addicted to present and the closest future. What kind of partnership are you talking about, when NATO is gradually expanding towards Russia, in order to make it easier to invade the Russian soil in any case? U.S. have paralyzed and sanctioned Russia in almost every economic and military parameter. Pentagon and Halliburton don't need partnership. They need money and totalitarian control over every economy in this world.
vendetta007mike 1 year ago
@vendetta007mike
oh, stop living in the past. it's not going to get us anywhere. we need to keep moving forward. if we kept old grudges then we'd all be enemies and the world would go to hell.
jadeyes914 1 year ago
@vendetta007mike
wrong! we don't have the money to "dominate" anything. right now, we're more focused on our economy and, most importantly, healthcare. that's all i hear about now these days which is starting to annoy
jadeyes914 1 year ago
HAHA EVERY US PRESIDEMTIAL CANDITATE went to AIPEC FOR APROVAL Hilary promisedsheWILL bomb iran F the allowed her to beccome president WHY DO americans vote for? see on you tube the computer programmer who stated on OATH about the programme he was comisions to creat foe rigging the elections federal reserve IMF world bank all owned by private bankers all screwing up america to slavery te also own u r news media u r government have HUGE influences in the CIA aks who runs u r tel. exchange
polygamous1 2 years ago