Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Religion and science: Ignorance is NOT rationality.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
17,915
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 11, 2008

Asking questions is easy. It is far harder to find reliable answers. It can be harder still to accept them (or even contemplate them).

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Tax religion now!

  • ppl don't still believe in 'the gods' ......do they.....crazy

Video Responses

This video is a response to Science speaks against God?
see all

All Comments (292)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @NickmeisterX16

    During the Fukushima disasters there was a media moment where an organizer made sure to communicate that while they appreciate aid packages, shipping bibles would take space and weight where water, food or blankets would be better received.

    Religion while the intent may be good, often does more harm. Just look at what the Catholic church is doing in Africa regarding condom use. They are in effect committing genocide.

  • @nolobede Religion already does that to itself. Money misguidedly spent i feel; but at least a good portion of it goes to good causes (I hope).

  • Actually gravity plays virtually no part in particle interaction, it's mostly electro-magnetic in nature. And a 2006 paper entitled 'A Universe Without Weak Interactions' (Harnik, R. et al) explains that a universe without the Weak Nuclear Force would be largely unchanged from our own. Therefore half of the forces that govern the universe aren't required to sustain life.

    Some "fine tuning", eh?

  • @PascalsWager5 I think he was trying to point out the difference between the intuition on the probability of Gods existence and the complex religion that says with absolute certainty God exists. Its easy to justify the first, the second not so much.

  • You'd really have to count the assertions in the bible, not the no of words

  • @socratus1

    In short you're argument is..."Its ok if the Bible is wrong, because we can always change what it means"?

  • Bible’s stories Old Bible story: "He... hanged the Earth upon nothing " / Job 26:7 / New Bible story: According to the many scientific experts however, space and time didn't exist prior to the Big Bang It is possible to say, "He... hanged the Big Bang upon nothing " This situation is strange But if we think that ‘nothing’ is a Reference Frame ( Vacuum) then the situation will be different # Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts / Richard Feynman /
  • @hydrogenpi16 oh dear, you just dont get it do you?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more