Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Re Bible is BS part 4

This is a video refuting Penn and Tellers the Bible is Bullchips. Ignatius of Antioch was the bishop I forgot the name of during this video. Here is his information from wikipideia. Ignatius of A...  
 
Customize

More From: MessangerOfTheCross

Loading...
Play All Stop Autoplaying | Play Next

QuickList(0)

1
Clear | Save

Related Videos

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
6 ratings
Sign in to rate
87 views
Flag
close
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Video Response

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (7)   Options

Loading...
silverbeak (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I have never said it happened "by accident".
But again, you make the same mistake. Just because you cannot explain something does not justify that you fill that hole of knowledge with "god" without further research. Even if you dismiss the chance that we came here by pure "accident" as you call it, it does not guarantee the existence of god. It merely tells us that we don't know how it happened. Filling that void with "god" is just cheap consolidation. Let's make an effort to find out instead.
MessangerOfTheCross (7 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Well Atheist do this as well for answers to things that it is very plausable God is the answer and they say science doesn't know yet. Science just explains how things happen not why.
silverbeak (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well. You even spell it out yourself. When atheists cannot explain something (yet), we simply say that we cannot explain it (yet).
But when believers encounter something they cannot explain, they always fall back on their default "god" hypothesis. That is the same as saying "No, I don't want to investigate the matter, I just want to believe in god. Please don't ruin my delusion by proving me wrong."
MessangerOfTheCross (6 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
No I am not saying do not look into the matter or inverstigate it. What I am saying is everytime their is a scientific discovery that leads to evidence for God such as the design even for the intial conditions for the big bang itself, or DNA ect ect people tend to jump on the Atheistic band wagon for a few things that don't even prove God does not exist all it might prove is the innerency of the Bible such as with evolution.
silverbeak (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It is not up to us to prove that god does not exist. It is up to you to prove that he does. You cannot disprove Bertrand Russel's celestial teapot, but that does not mean you believe in it, do you? (Google it if you don't know what it means)
And by the way, there has never been any scientific discovery that leads to the evidence of god's existence.
I'd also like to ask you to improve your punctuation. Sometimes I just don't understand what you're getting at...
MessangerOfTheCross (6 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Wow honesly you are right the creator of the universe is just a tea-pot honesly you just showed us how smart of a guy you are. Ok I agree with you no problem.
silverbeak (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You really had that much trouble understanding the analogy, or are you just playing stupid? I hope it's the latter.
Know what? Let's just say this ends here. I'm sorry, but this is no longer an argument. It's me arguing, and you trying to ridicule me by deliberately misunderstanding what I write. Sorry dude, but that's just lame...
silverbeak (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Just because there are things happening around you that you (or doctors, as you seem to speak for) does not mean there is a god. What you are saying when you call something "unexplainable" is simply saying that you cannot expain it. It does not have anything to do with god.
3/4 doctors believe in god? Or is it that 3/4 doctors have seen things that they cannot explain?
Theists have still to prove the existence of god. Give us hard evidence.
MessangerOfTheCross (7 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
The very fact we exist is evidence the fact that we ourselves as intelligent people can not create human life from non living things yet you want to say it happend by accident. Then on top of that even if we could make life from non living material we still have to use already existing material to do that we can not create something from nothing only God could do such a thing.
MessangerOfTheCross (7 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
You like what I do you don't like it this is your buisness. No one is forcing you to watch my videos.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.