Lord Monckton on Climategate: Whistle Blower, Not A "Hacker"

Climategate emails were released by a whistle blower, not a hacker according to analysis by CFACT Advisor Lord Christopher Monckton. Sign the petition at www.allpainnogain.org and follow CFACT's Mission Copenhagen at www.cfact.tv

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• CFACT
• Copenhagen
• COP15
• Monckton

[gesiriech]

My suspicions all along. The e-mails were compiled by the CRU in anticipation of a FOIA act request. Whether to released or deleted. Someone got ahold of the compiled files and liberated it as Tom Paine mentioned. I'm really starting to like Lord Monkton. Would any of the Brits on here be willing to trade him for Algore?

[bfpccbm]

This whole thing is not about global warming......can you imagine these warming nuts controling the world.....keep your powder dry.........

[rremsiJackson]

the whistle blower was Harold Lewis.. he was a respected scientist and resigned over this global warming climate scam...6 months later he was dead!! Go figure.. where was his protection??

[nobama6]

It's truly funny how a certain group of people love wikileaks, but hate when their fake causes are opened to the light of day. In the U.S., there was a movement to try to link people who argued against "global warming" to holocaust deniers. That about sums it up right there. When you're required to demonize people in that way, perhaps you've run out of arguments for your fake science.

[blabby102]

@rudesskeys No, I don't mean like Al Gore. Al Gore is not a scientist nor has he ever done any research into climate science ever. He is a politician who made a documentary about the issue. I mean like I said in my original comment. He should debate real climate scientists (good luck!) rather than going after hippies on the street and politicians with no scientific training. How can he possibly answer accusations like this /watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM

[rudesskeys]

@blabby102 You mean like PhD Scientist Al Gore?... oh wait. not to mention the fact that Monckton has many times called for debates against climate advocates , he was literally denied the ability to debate Gore in congress. this whole global warming thing is a SHAM and is meant to dilute and destroy the western democracies and economies.

[Samsgarden]

Yep, The New York Times exposed them.

[KingDingaLing090]

Blabby thinks there is a consensus.... omg you are so confused.

A consensus of global warming?

PWAAAAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!!!

WHat global warming???????

[KingDingaLing090]

@blabby102 Holy shit! People still believe this SHIT??? HAhahahah

aaahahahahaaaaaa.....

You tell me something. How much global warming have we had in the last 8 years. And site your source.

ANd Thatcher is a free market environmentalist the exact opposite of the UN cap and trade lobby. Read "Hot Air and Global Warming" where she says climate change/global warming is "provides a marvelous excuse for worldwide, supra-national socialism". And she is confused, there is no climate change.

[blabby102]

@KingDingaLing090 It is funny that Monckton who has never studied science would be a science adviser to Thatcher who is one of the few world leaders who is actually trained in science. He must have done a pretty bad job of being a "science adviser" because Thatcher personally understands climate change and is an advocate for taking action to prevent it.

[blabby102]

@AceDude944 I wonder, if Monckton has ground-breaking information that will reverse the worldwide scientific consensus and revolutionize our understanding of the planet, why doesn't he publish his amazing findings? If he wants to debate in science, he should enter the arena of science rather that debating laymen and hippie tree-huggers on the street.

[blabby102]

There is no use using real research results or logic to counter these people's deluded arguments. Lord Monckton is a good debater. He is not a scientist.

Unfortunately for humanity, the scientific method always looses against a debater who twists facts.

Science is inherently self-criticizing and scientists always state their weak points out in the open. This form of honesty can be torn to pieces by a skilled debater no matter what the real facts are.