Why the Moon Hoax makes no sense : Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,961
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 28, 2007

Part 2 of 9 of 'Why the Moon Hoax makes no sense' presented by Peter Barrett of the Canberra Skeptics on Friday, 13 April 2007 at the Visions Theatre, National Museum of Australia, Acton Peninsula.

There are people who believe that NASA faked the Moon Landings on a sound stage in Area 51, or Sudbury in Canada, or somewhere in Australia - and many people find Moon Hoax arguments superficially convincing.

But the logic which is used to support Moon Hoax arguments very quickly becomes self-contradictory. In fact, it requires NASA to be simultaneously brilliant and stupid. And although Moon Hoax supporters muster what appears to be strong technical evidence in support of their arguments, these arguments are surprisingly easy to demolish.

In this talk, Peter will examine a range of Moon Hoax arguments, explain why they make no sense, and discuss why the Moon Hoax matters. (Don't worry, no technical knowledge is required !)

Related links:

Canberra Skeptics: http://finch.customer.netspace.net.au/skeptics/

Australian Skeptics: http://www.skeptics.com.au/

Moon Base Clavius: http://www.clavius.org

Bad Astronomy: http://www.badastronomy.com

Apollo Lunar Surface Journal: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/frame.html

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 17 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (mddawson1)

  • the Russian monkeys and astronauts got fried by radiation documented fact!!!!!

    and the space shuttle got to close to the van allin belts the lone astronaut feared for his life and hid behind the led battery's ordered by nassa to hide there.

    funny how the moon shot went threw then during a solar storm with no radiation affects high. only an intellectual idiot could say we went to the moon back then or an indoctrinated fool.

  • @williamrobinsonb James Van Allen (the person who discovered these) has public stated that people can travel safely through them. How about you do a bit of research first rather than confirming that you are a fool?

Top Comments

  • But why is it that the debunkers always have more facts and sound smarter than people like you?

  • 'facts'? it's called conspiracy 'theory'.

see all

All Comments (96)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @williamrobinsonb An intellectual idiot? An interesting opinion from someone who can't spell 'Van Allen', 'lead', 'Nasa', 'effects', 'through', 'batteries'...

  • @williamrobinsonb exactly like other have answer the van belt thing is overrule, james van allen have stated like the comment below says, to have got enought radiation to fried the astronaut would have had to be in the direct path of a solar flare and they are rare, and to get in the path you have to be really unlucky cause the space is so vast,

    how many sateliute have been lost in the last decade?? not much because of radiation burst

  • @yaluobud - If you don't know who he was then there is no way you can confirm his story. Check out that website I mentioned as it is run by the people who were actually working there at the time, not some anonymous person you claimed to have talked to.

  • @mddawson1

    It is not BS, I was there and it was not a lie. No I do not know his name but he was quite amazed by the situation why the dish wasn't pointing towards the moon. Take it or leave it!

  • @yaluobud  - is this the best BS you can come up with??? What was his name? You don't know because you are lying. Go to honeysucklecreek dotnet to read the truth.

  • NASA still has an Apollo mission promotions department to keep the pathetic 'Lie' alive. It is a given it was all faked, yet some patriotic morons just can't accept that they had been lied to and that the US government could do such a thing.

    Oh Machiavellian propaganda, how deceitful thou art!

  • @mddawson1

    In 1970 I talked to one of the tracking dish operators at NASA's Honeysuckle Creek Tracking Station (the first place to receive images) who believed he was following the signals from the moon and moving the dish to get best reception as Earth rotated. When he finished his shift and went outside and looked up, the dish wasn't even pointing at the moon, he had been tracking a communications satellite all along. Global TV coverage was achieved in 1967 & NASA used that system to fool us.

  • For the proof Apollo was real, that hoaxtards don't want you to see: watch?v=Dwib6nve_0k

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more