Evolution: Carl Sagan Style

He was the man.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Carl
• Sagan
• Evolution
• Man
• Jesus
• God
• Religon
• Christ

[lellowranger]

I don't see how people can reject such a logical and simply beautiful explanation for life on earth, but instead cling to a book written 1500 years ago which has absolutely no evidence supporting it's claims. It ignores reason and discourages human curiosity, allowing it to perpetuate purely on faith and childhood indoctrination. Hardly the basis for logical substitute to evolution. Remember folks, evolution is just as much a theory as gravity is!

[MyJimminyCricket]

Anyone else notice that Carl Sagan says humans like "youmans" haha. Just sounds funny. Great vid though.

[5tonyvvvv]

@ratsvadumee LOL, The Miller experiment failed abysmally!! There was ZERO Information, Miller produced Toxic Tar and Racemic Mixtures!! Thats all man and the universe can produce is Racemic Mixtures even under amazing laboratory conditions all you get is Racemic mixtures!! and even if all LEFT handed amino acids are present what is going to assemble them! I see you are just another Indoctrinated person!

[ratsvadumee]

@5tonyvvvv miller experiment son... miller experiment.

read a book the world will be clearer to you.

[Wofaze]

@MyJimminyCricket

Can't unhear..

[5tonyvvvv]

what BULLSHIT.. there is ZERO testable chemistry to back up RNA,DNA forming or changing by chance. evolutionists have bullshit assumptions.imaginary atheist chemistry...the cell by chance is a dead end stale mate paradox..as well as homochirality..

[franktastikart]

@komokoro there is no missing link! during the 50s, when scientists were looking for proof of evolution. at that stage, there was only limited archaeological evidence of any species intermediate between modern humans and other primates, apart from the relatively modern Cro-Magnon However numerous primitive human skeletons have since been found in Africa and elsewhere, providing evidence of several intermediate stages of evolution over more than 2 million years. As expected.

[PeaceOfTruth]

@komokoro I think a careful examination and study of evolution will help answer many questions, we do not know everything but we do have a general idea how it is and how it is possible. Scientific theory is actually different than the normal uses of the word theory. Scientific theories are backed up by hundreds of evidences,observation, experiments, testing, and analyses to confirm that it's quite true.

[smartwarlord]

@the0fart0machine

How can one admit evolution happened, but then hold to man magically appearing out of nowhere? Is this because of your bias? Since there are no Evolutionary Biologists who deny evolution of man.

[the0fart0machine]

@smartwarlord I've read many books on evolution and yes evolution has happened. The point is does Darwinism explain the whole story, I believe it doesn't. Also science has not made the case 100% for man evolved from a common ancestor. To answer your question about gravity. We still don't know what gravity is or where it came from. 9.8 m/s^2 doesn't answer everthing.

[smartwarlord]

@the0fart0machine

The main reason why non-scientists get angry when other non-scientists criticize Evolution, is because very few times does the questioner understand evolution at all. No one wants to defend gravity, why do you make people defend evolution?