Proof of Evo 3- Atavisms and Fossils (Final)

Third time releasing this video, with the entire nipple sequence of medicinal drawings blocked, so creationists have no reason to flag.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• proof
• of
• atavisms
• fossil
• record
• theory
• creationism
• intelligent
• design
• charles
• darwin
• dawkins

[angusmcpherson]

Excuse me, but you just said that we find whales with legs, but we don't find fish with legs. What about the mudskipper?

Please don't think I am being unfriendly by asking this, I'm just searching for the truth.

[DonExodus2]

@angusmcpherson Good question- modified fins are not the same as true bony legs- the anatomy is very unique, and conclusive. Although they may appear similar (bat wings and bird wings), when you get a closer look, its unmistakable.

[gotohellfast]

I bet , no Christian will actually see the whole video.

They will switch the channel to something less educational like Sponge Bob.

Some of them are still pushing the buttons on their TV remote -but the computer does somehow not respond to it.

[Epydemic2020]

Your videos are quite good.

[ThoroughbredofSin]

In the video you have a frame referring  to Tiktaalik starting at 4:50. At 4:57 you mention a link that can be found in the video description. It seems that during the re-posting you neglected to include the link. Just letting you know.

[billyraybar]

@gotohellfast

Wrong. I've never met a non-religious person that denied evolution but I've met plent of religious people that accepted evolution (Catholics accept evolution). If one believes denying evolution is required to believe in God ...it must be a painful life.

[2pacmonkeylove]

154 theist can't handle the truth.

[mikevaneck1]

If you took all the water out of the oceans you will notice there is dirt underneath ! the continents are not just floating around.

[TerrencePhillip66]

@TerrencePhillip66 Sorry, should have said the creationist model is for idiots.

[TerrencePhillip66]

@TypicalRepublican Hydrological sorting? Nautlius shells float for week after the animal dies. Plant material is bouyant or almost bouyant. Where are they found in your 'flood column'. Larger animals are denser than smaller animals. Bacteria and single celled organisnms would stay suspended in the water for months. Hydrological sorting is for idiots.

[LeopardFrogPilboxhat]

@angus

When you compare the bones of lobe finned fish which amphibians came from we see a correspondence and in fact shifts from one form to another. Mudskippers are ray finned fish and their structure is quite different.

If you search for Neil Shubin's for his book "your inner fish" he has all of his diagrams of the bones of the known fish to tetrapod transition avaliable for free. Though you buy that book yourself and see it explained in depth but understandable. Carl Zimmer's book too

[LeopardFrogPilboxhat]

@TypicalRepublican

Several problems with that. For one the layers furthest to the bottom have no life at all. Which is what you would expect.

Flora and fauna are also seen in sucession. For example there are hundreds of millions of years without flowering or vascular plants, just ferns and such. Not a single flower is found. There aren't fossil shark teeth (which are discarded frequently in the precambrian

Cetaceans are again found successively and only starting in one age and continuing on