There is video in YouTube about blacklight power by ifreed0m. Here it is only 60% of it.
It is another case of "free energy" process, that was discovered and elaborated inside Rowan University. Still, the standard academic science does not have the slightest idea where the additional energy, in the energy balance of this process , comes from.
Since it is validated by Universities , there is not the danger of accusations of being a fraud etc. And since it is highly unlikely that it is already a military classified technology, there does not seem to be a fatal obstruction in developing it. The only real difficulty is the conceptual inadequacy of the present physics.
In my perception, the missing concept to understand where this renewable energy comes from is by shifting from the old concept of "electromagnetic field" of an atom , "gravitational field" of an atom and "quantum vacuum" in an atom, as empty space for interactions propagation, to a more realistic concept of a finer layer of physical and real gaseous matter around the known particles, made from permanent particles again (as permanent as protons, neutrons, electrons) but vastly smaller (e.g. 10^(-40) as order of smaller size). All energy of almost all the "free energy devices" or "overunity devices" seems that it comes from the internal energy of this finer gaseous material layer (centuries ago called by Newton, Maxwell and many other, aether). Which is equivalent to saying that it is from the potential energy of the new unified electro-gravitational (and not only) field. And it is renewable because both it is a vast reservoir and it is replenished by the transfer of energy through friction of protons electrons and neutrons in this finer gaseous material layer of the molecular heat energy. This is the required conceptual leap for standard academic science to unblock the development of cheaper and zero CO2 emissions energy.
I like this but what is the powder ???????????
noggin100 1 year ago
@noggin100 This powder seems to be the new fuel that substitutes gasoline, or coal . They make it through a reaction of water, salt, and other common materials. In this reaction they provide less energy that what is stored in the powder. The extra energy is provided from unknown source. They claim that it costs 1-2 cents per KWH versus 6-10 cents per KWH of coal. Quite complicated experimental devices! Not indeed so elegant compared to other amateur's devices. But academic engineering!
DrKCostas 1 year ago