Help me out Atheists

No description available.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• emptywithoutjesus
• athesit
• God
• Love
• jesus
• Fairytale
• of
• evolution
• beneficial
• mutations?

[shadroth]

As a scientist, let me explain peer review to you. A paper submitted to the journal gets assigned to a scientific editor. The editor finds a referee who is a world expert on that subject and the expert critiques the paper with papers often being rejected. This is not how Creationist journals work. If indeed they are peer-reviewed, they are being sent to people who ALREADY AGREE with the fundamental premises of a God and a young Earth. This isn't peer review, it's patting each other on the back.

[YOURINQUIRER]

@emptywithoutjesus Only as biased as your teacher was against poor work.

[inclinedude23]

How stupid are you? Do you really not realize that you are stupid? I implore you to take an iq test, guarantee you would score below 100.

[WAZZA1235]

@VideoAudioDisco09 True !!!!!

[VideoAudioDisco09]

@emptywithoutjesus

>>empirically verified this, ever<< YES

[VideoAudioDisco09]

@emptywithoutjesus

Remember when it comes to biblical scholars...

Christians NEED apologetics - "apologetics is the effort to show that the preferred faith is not irrational, that believing in it is not against human reason,"

If it was so plainly obvious it would not be needed, but developed and employed in a far more uninformed, unenlightened and uneducated time. Even back then they were in trouble for being ludicrous and unbelievable. Little has changed.

[VideoAudioDisco09]

@emptywithoutjesus

Conman Lee, I have seen many of his videos I picked a number of errors strait away and in follow up have seen the debunking of Stobel. He could be genuinly ignorant or stupid but I think he is lying deliberatly.

Clever calasthenics with words appeals to emotion, strawman classics and misrepresentaion of known facts even some pure fabrication. Most atheists read the bible thats why they are atheists.

No witnesses wrote the bible check real biblical scholars, its fiction.

[VideoAudioDisco09]

@emptywithoutjesus

This does not even make sence..

What you are saying is

A scientific theory, "An hypothesis supported by facts, evidence, experimentation and observable results"

Is a

Unscientific unobservable theory... (not sure how one observes any theory)

Any implicit assumption is fine because it will be thrown out when proved wrong and is only used to establish the truth.

You can not see gravity or electricity why not argue against them makes just as much sence.

[VideoAudioDisco09]

@emptywithoutjesus

Everything comes from something. That's a scientific law.?? (where did he come from?)

Cosmology has 3 main theories, the most supported is the "big bang"

in 1965 the "cosmic microwave background" was discovered as predicted.

The theory only begins after the first 1 second, it fits the evidence.

sceince does not know YET. It has only been 100 years.

youtube.com/watch?v=e_4bMIqmV9­U

It has nothing to do with Evolution and whatever is discovered it is not magic.

[emptywithoutjesus]

Strobels a con man? And for what reason, because he debunks all your atheistic nonsense? I thought so. His book is a bulls eye into any atheists heart because most atheists don't do the research to try to disprove Christianity. if they did, they too would end up believers.

Read the book of Luke and Acts (same author) for reliability of the facts and historicity. It is a known fact that any journalist would conclude that Luke was an actual eyewitness to the event of his day.

[emptywithoutjesus]

@VideoAudioDisco09 likewise, I find it bizarre that you trust unscientific unobservable theory's. Ideas based on presuppositions of what they THINK may have happened.