Ridiculous claims of TV Fakery from Jews - 9/11

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
455 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 2, 2009

The truth movement is run by Jews. Alex Jones, Jim Fetzer, Steven E. Jones, Eric Hufschmid, Daryl Smith, Christopher Bollyn, Jim Hoffman and others are Jews, who mix truth with lies.

They pretend to suspect each other of being "infiltrators"/shills/disinfo agents. And they are going to keep discussing details forever...

The claims of TV Fakery are lies from some of the Jews in the truth movement.

http://home.gethome.no/liberal/

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (GentilesAgainstCrime)

  • either way...even missiles couldnt do this...only engineered demolitions can do what we saw on 911. so planes or missliles, we still have to know who put the bombs in the building. such a controlled demolision??? with missiles is as stupid as believing that planes brought the tower down. so they might as well have used planes for show. and what a show???

    your antisemitism ain't helping.

  • @zebb1111 Arabs are semites. 9/11 was a Jew job.

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL PWNED. NO PLANE PEOPLE R IDIOTS

  • "I'm not convinced there was a second, third, of fourth."

    I don't think you are as dense as you pretend to be.

  • "after viewing camera angles from what appeared to be from 2 opposite angles,"

    You're babbling. There are many videos. You have to tell what video you're talking about.

    " I saw the first, "

    Where did you see it?

    "after viewing camera angles... I saw no second plane"

    You can see the plane in this video:

    watch?v=mc2tfVuaSrg

    "not convinced that there was a 2nd, 3rd, or 4th."

    Nobody said there was a third. What we're saying is that the claim of no second plane is a Jewish lie.

  • "I'm not convinced there was a second, third, of fourth."

    You're being ridiculous. You pretend you don't understand this video at all.

  • @GentilesAgainstCrime seemingly, after viewing camera angles from what appeared to be from 2 opposite angles, I saw no second plane, I saw the first, but am not convinced that there was a 2nd, 3rd, or 4th. I don't know this to be fact, but this is my more recent analysis.

  • @GentilesAgainstCrime I have a deep appreciation for knowledge, and for like-minded individuals as you seem to be. Of course, we are unique, and we, of course, share similarities. My most recent understanding of the circumstances is that the first plane was a plane, I'm not convinced there was a second, third, of fourth. I've analyzed the footage, and other perspectives for roughly, (9) years,

  • Can you please explain in more detail what you mean? What did you see and what didn't you see?

  • Sorry, the second plane. Complimenting your point I believe.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more