Fighting Global Warming Hysteria Down Under
Top Comments
All Comments (86)
-
@4rooney that would be funny if it were true.
-
@garlicbreds "You cant just dismiss the 97% without some pretty good evidence." You can't submit that figure without some pretty good evidence (if you're referring to the Doran & Zimmerman poll, which itself was grossly unscientific, you have abhorent standards). Yes, we have experts for a reason, but if they don't agree then you have to man up and start thinking for yourself. Even if it IS only 3% (bullshit figure, of course) -- Michelson, Morley, Wegener, and Galileo weren't right by majority.
-
@hayesism You are out of your depth in arguing with Nilopollis. His position is quite sound. We have experts in our society for a reason - so we dont have to waste our own time becoming skilled in every profession. Specialisation is how we advance our civilisation.
You cant just dismiss the 97% without some pretty good evidence. Nilopollis is smart enough to know that. You are not, & are arguing like a child. You probably wont change your mind until your peers do.
-
there is nothing wrong with green ann. tis the colour of that little island you are from
-
Your right, its all a conspiracy. Now put on your tinfoil hat before they read your brain. Dont forget to skip the vaccinations too or the chem-trails will get you.
-
Thank, you. You are such a joy to watch!
-
Make an argument?
Well, you have lots of arguments in front of you but you refuse to pick them up.
For example I said people like me have EVERY reason in the world not to believe people like you.
Maybe I need to paint a picture for you:
the global warming issue is one that will have real-life implications, like individual and national sovereignty being cast out, new sets of rule pandered by global elite, one-world government by UN, if you ever care to look at human politics and history...
-
I would debate this with you, but I prefer to deal with young earth creationists and moon landing conspiracy theorists. They are far more reasonable.
Was this posted before the climate gate emails and NASA admitting they had released bad data sets?
It's just a coincidence, no conspiracy to keep the gravy train running.
Just curious how that "evidence" you claim, based on consensus, like a religion is, stands up now?
You probably even thought the glaciers falling into the sea in Gore's propaganda were real and not just CGI. Who needs the truth when you can just photoshop in what you want people to beLIEve in spite of what they know.
Slavestorms 2 years ago 3
On the other hand if you would just drop the theory, the planet is not going to melt over night for lack of action! Even if global warming is man made, which I doubt, there is no conclusive proof as to which element contributes the most, and it is almost certainly not CO2 (+/- 0.04% total atmosp)
The 'consensus' is in your dull heads.
alleyghost 2 years ago