Foreskin Man No. 2

Read Foreskin Man No. 2 online at www.foreskinman.com:

Miah Redstone belatedly makes plans to attend her nephew's bris when she learns that his circumcision has been cancelled. But will someone in the family have a change of heart? In the meantime, a rash of circumstraint thefts from California hospitals has the news media buzzing, and Miles Hastwick celebrates the opening of his new Brit Milah exhibit at the Museum of Genital Integrity.

Written and Edited by Matthew Hess

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Foreskin
• Man
• circumcision
• male
• genital
• mutilation

[555mylife888]

It figures most of the religious fanatics think that they can improve on their GOD's creation, made in his image.. Its about time this religious lie, practice got exposed - It was started in order to control the sexual activities of the race... what they are cutting off is the most sensitive part of the organ, thus reducing the joy of having sex..control freaks claiming to be a GOD wanna-be.... wooooo

[joelface]

The premise is amusing, and I appreciate the effort and good intentions that went into making it. The art is pretty incredible!

Let's be honest though, on its own, this will convince no one that circumcision is wrong. And, as an intactivist, I can assure you that the key to stopping circumcision will never involve violence or baby kidnapping.

Nevertheless, it will bring about a lot of interesting press, and that opens doors to dialogue that can make positive change. And that is very positive.

[TheWorstWarlock]

I think a lot of Jewish people are overreacting. Negative portrayals of Christian priests are everywhere in the media, either ridiculing or vilifying them (granted, in some cases, it's not unfair) and Christians take it with a grain of salt. If you like, look at it this way: If a baby could understand such things, then from his point of view a mohel would indeed be a villain and a "Foreskin Man" would be a heroic figure.

[Chadolution]

I am deeply opposed to genital cutting of unconsenting children. It needs to come to a quick and complete end.

There is no excuse for sexual abuse. No one should have to suffer as I have.

[AnimeFanboy5]

I though I dont think his intentions were antisemantic... but it has unfortunate connottations.

beyond that.

it doesnt at all with the reasons WHY we should, and should not do it.

shooting down some of the myhts of why we should do it, and saying why we should would be much better.

[DeSoccerRefMan]

You may be right. I think it is NOT good to mutilate baby boys or girls. If a boy wants to be mutilated when he is 18+ let him have the choice. Don't force it on him like some sort of right of passage. Surely the big cheese (god) has collected enough foreskins by now to make another planet. no more can possibly be required, right?

[xxdiogenescynicxx]

@DeSoccerRefMan Jews are the ones who started promoting this shit in the states though. The blame lays with them here.

[AstarteVX]

@wdmm94 many.

[0rbis2010]

The anti-circumcision movement makes sense. Babies should not be hurt or imposed on by doctors dishing dubious medical reasons now known to be false. Male mutilation is as cruel as female mutilation. Let the Jews do as they wish, but doctors should leave all other babies alone. The sinister depiction of the rabbis and moyle's however detract from the seriousness of the movement. I hope that is corrected in the future.

[wdmm94]

@StelloLIVE Leave the Muslims alone!!!! It would be better if you would fight against the KILLING of Babies rather than protecting a little piece of ugly vagina skin. Really no man finds an uncircumcised vagina attractive...but that's right...you'all don't care for men. You comment was so insulting that I just put the shoe on the other foot as it were.

[wdmm94]

@AstarteVX How many uncut dudes you been with to know this??????? 

[bulldogbell1980]

@wdmm94 Thanks for writing but it's in vain.  I've already had this argument with many before you. This is the biggest non-issue facing our culture today. Have a good day.

[wdmm94]

@pdgonzalez11 At 0:59 wasn't "people" being burned. but is a bunch of circumstraints being burned. These are the devices that are used to hold a baby while his genitals are being cut up.

[wdmm94]

@bulldogbell1980 Circumcision removes the most sensitive part of a man's penis. The five most sensitive areas of the penis are on the foreskin. The transitional region from the external to the internal foreskin is the most sensitive region of the fully intact penis, and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis.

Fine-Touch Pressure Thresholds In The Adult Penis

British Journal of Urology International,

2007, Vol. 99, No. 4, 864-869

Sorrells et al.

[wdmm94]

@bulldogbell1980 {{The majority agrees that female circumcision is cruel, not so for the male.}} You seem unaware that American medicine promoted female circ. for "health reasons", up until the 1960's, (covered by Blue Cross till 1977) and that it got started for the same reasons (in USA) as male circ.(for non Jews)- to stop masturbation!!!!

[wdmm94]

@bulldogbell1980 You should research "functions" or "physiology" of the foreskin before saying something like "of excessive skin clipped". Would you advocate cutting off other parts of your body at birth as well because, "most people prefer it that way"???? {{I'm glad I was circumcised young cause' I heard it takes longer to heal when you're older}} this is based on an assumption that you would have even NEEDED to - 99.999% of intact men in Europe never have to be circ'ed "later"!!!!

[EnoFrisk]

monster

a cruel, wicked, or inhuman person

any creature so ugly or monstrous as to frighten people.

This accurately describes the circumciser (mohel) in the eyes of the victim

[parkwoodlounge]

That's not a "Jewish symbol" at 0:59, that's a shield with the letter "I" for Intactivist. And it's not "made of people," but rather of circumstraints, the plastic board devices used to hold down babies who are being genitally mutilated. I agree that the scene is odd, but it's not racist and has nothing to do with Judaism. It was actually based on a real bonfire of circumstraints that was held at Burning Man a few years back. See video: watch?v=mpdzh_VBxbM

[RockoMyler]

@FlaviaR Again, the comic is the work of one person and should not be considered representative of the views of the anti-circumcision movement as a whole. To say that the entire movement condones this sort of offensive material is frankly absurd, and to say that the anti-circumcision movement primarily "targets" the Jewish people is also inaccurate; you yourself said that the majority of circumcisions are non-Jewish in nature, and it is this secular medical practice that is the movement's focus.

[FlaviaR]

@RockoMyler, there are plenty of self-hating Jews, these people being Jewish does nothing to dispel either that truism, or what I said. & I wouldn't be so fast the brag about Edell, either, strictly on a medical front.

[kedocom]

if Jews were a race it would be racial but jews are members of a religion not a race other than the human race ....anti-wholiness is the problem not the answer.

[AbuAvital]

There are far better ways to promote the debate other than racist literature, which makes one wonder what is formost in the producers minds.