Uploaded by USAvsMicrosoftTrial on Apr 2, 2010
United States v. Microsoft was a set of consolidated civil that actions filed against Microsoft Corporation pursuant to the Sherman Antitrust Act on May 18, 1998 by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and 20 U.S. states. Joel I. Klein was the lead prosecutor. The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power on Intel-based personal computers in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales. The issue central to the case was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its flagship Internet Explorer (IE) web browser software with its Microsoft Windows operating system. Bundling them together is alleged to have been responsible for Microsoft's victory in the browser wars as every Windows user had a copy of Internet Explorer. It was further alleged that this unfairly restricted the market for competing web browsers (such as Netscape Navigator or Opera) that were slow to download over a modem or had to be purchased at a store. Underlying these disputes were questions over whether Microsoft altered or manipulated its application programming interfaces (APIs) to favor Internet Explorer over third party web browsers, Microsoft's conduct in forming restrictive licensing agreements with original equipment manufacturer (OEMs), and Microsoft's intent in its course of conduct. Microsoft stated that the merging of Microsoft Windows and Internet Explorer was the result of innovation and competition, that the two were now the same product and were inextricably linked together and that consumers were now getting all the benefits of IE for free. Those who opposed Microsoft's position countered that the browser was still a distinct and separate product which did not need to be tied to the operating system, since a separate version of Internet Explorer was available for Mac OS. They also asserted that IE was not really free because its development and marketing costs may have kept the price of Windows higher than it might otherwise have been. The case was tried before Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The DOJ was initially represented by David Boies.
-
8 likes, 0 dislikes
10:00
United States vs Microsoft Trial Day 1 : part 8by USAvsMicrosoftTrial1,184 views
10:00
United States vs Microsoft Trial Day 1 : part 6by USAvsMicrosoftTrial1,363 views
4:48
United States vs Microsoft Trial Day 1 : part 5by USAvsMicrosoftTrial1,282 views
10:00
United States vs Microsoft Trial Day 1 : part 9by USAvsMicrosoftTrial1,283 views
10:55
United States vs Microsoft Trial Day 1 : part 4by USAvsMicrosoftTrial1,900 views
5:03
Gates Deposition Greatest Hitsby terribledepo46,181 views
11:36
Jay Z Sits Down With WARREN BUFFETby slimthuggles56,588 views
9:51
United States vs Microsoft Trial Day 1 : part 18by USAvsMicrosoftTrial3,974 views
9:57
Bill Gates - Deposition Part 5by fleetwoodsucks5,180 views
9:57
Bill Gates - Deposition Part 4by fleetwoodsucks5,599 views
1:47
Monopoly, Microsoft trialby pop176,376 views
10:00
United States vs Microsoft Trial Day 1 : part 13by USAvsMicrosoftTrial812 views
9:57
Bill Gates - Deposition Part 3by fleetwoodsucks9,095 views
9:49
Bill Gates - Deposition Part 2by fleetwoodsucks15,158 views
10:00
United States vs Microsoft Trial Day 1 : part 14by USAvsMicrosoftTrial744 views
9:57
Bill Gates - Deposition Part 1by fleetwoodsucks18,472 views
1:42
TV Judge Completely Ends Smartass Lawyerby SECTOR00131,333,517 views
1:13
Best Deposition Question Everby bpmarshall56,307 views
9:00
Interview with Mark Russinovich by Microsoft Student Partnersby wouterke19901,454 views
4:24
V for Vendetta - Introduction to Eveyby questingQuentin96,716 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Link to this comment:
All Comments (1)