@TreasureChestReviews That doesn't make a lot of sense dude. The car wouldn't get weaker over time. Parts like the engine and stuff may break but that doesn't mean the care itself would become flimsy.
@djkurse1 Also notice how the driver's area of the 2009 is still intact, as opposed to the bel-air which now has the engine of the 2009 where the driver should be
@olditaliancarlover By showing what could happen to unthinking Bel Air drivers, they probably saved a lot of Bel Airs in the process.
jcasetnl 3 days ago
DESTROY THIS CLASSIC CAR....STUPID IDEA !!
PIECE OF SHIT !! PRESERVE THE STORY NOT DESTROY !!!
FUCK FUCK FUCK
olditaliancarlover 2 months ago
All lies..that 59 woulds turned that 09 into a bumper sticker and wouldnt of stopped till it hit the expressway!Musta had chinese sheet metal on it.
TheMusclecarGod 2 months ago
Still dosen't convince me the new one isn't any better, and besides one of the viewers correctly noted the classic car had no engine inside!
The greedy & bankrupt car companies want you to buy the new shitheap,
Si! Esta neuva coche es basura!
Receredo 3 months ago
Claro! O Bel-air está todo podre! Olhe o monte de terra q sai de dentro da caixa de ar do carro na hora q bate 1:00 esse teste foi armação
karlkestel 3 months ago
@TreasureChestReviews That doesn't make a lot of sense dude. The car wouldn't get weaker over time. Parts like the engine and stuff may break but that doesn't mean the care itself would become flimsy.
kiwis38 3 months ago
@djkurse1 Also notice how the driver's area of the 2009 is still intact, as opposed to the bel-air which now has the engine of the 2009 where the driver should be
jpo002 5 months ago
i just saw this video with the original audio and the classic car CLEARLY HAS NO FREAKIN ENGINE!!!t hey just want you to buy the new one!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lamppost904 7 months ago
Why? WHY?????
What a waste of a classic...
jmar1973 7 months ago 2
1964 Imperial would have been able to drive away from that crash.
fknndn 8 months ago